Not all hubs are made equal: A case study of airport governance in Europe

Abstract

The entire aviation industry was severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, leaving airplanes stranded and airports empty of the usual hustle. While the full consequences of this crisis are yet unknown, it only adds fuel to the ongoing debates about the future of the aviation sector, including airport capacity and environmental challenges facing many hub airports around Europe. While conventional aviation research describes the development of hub airports as a function of varying geo-economic variables, this research sheds light on the societal underpinnings of the makings of hub airports. From an airport governance perspective, a case study of four European hub airports, representing both expanding and struggling hubs, was conducted. Based on interviews with 31 airport stakeholders from four different countries (i.e. Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands and Switzerland) as well as a review of strategic and policy documents, the authors argue that the development of hub airports and their corresponding governance models is a non-linear process, informed to a great degree by societal and discursive factors. The authors conclude that developing and sustaining a well-functioning hub airport that supports regional development necessitates an active stance from local, regional and national authorities. A clear and strategic governance model is needed, one that is not limited to ownership and regulation questions, but one that guarantees a wide-ranging consensus among airport stakeholders. Finally, the paper provides a perspective on future potentials and challenges facing European hub airports.

Navigating Regional Airport System Economics: Insights from Central Europe and Croatia

“…Legislation is one of the important factors that needs to be analyzed when examining airport business models [41]. In general, the legislation establishes rules and regulations that affect the operation of regional airports [42].…”

Mobility Hubs: Review and Future Research Direction

“…Although still in their infancy, several definitions of MHs have been proposed. The term ‘hub’ embodies multiple transport-related concepts that are often dependent on scale, from large multiuse areas such as cities to a more defined type of hub such as an airport, which is a point of connectivity either for passengers or cargo ( 4 , 5 ). The meaning of this term has been extended to MHs, and one definition of MHs proposed by CoMoUK is as follows:A mobility hub is a recognisable place with an offer of different and connected transport modes supplemented with enhanced facilities and information features to both attract and benefit the traveller ( 6 ).…”