Not as simple as it looks: led outdoor activities are complex sociotechnical systems

Carden, Tony; Goode, Natassia; Salmon, Paul M.

doi:10.1080/1463922x.2017.1278806

Cited by 15 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One instance is the Led Outdoor Activities (LOA) [60] held annually in Australia and attended by thousands of people. The main characteristic of LOAs is to conduct outdoor activities [61] within school camps with a higher level of risk to achieve learning and developmental outcomes [62][63][64][65]. LOAs in Australia are conducted with low levels of negative incidents, despite the increased risk.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this regard, in the research of Carlfjord et al [32], it was shown how IR increases the pursuit of quality in the management of care delivered and places the management of safety of care for both physicians and staff at the 1st place on the nursing agenda. A well-planned and implemented incident reporting system can improve organizational culture of error reporting, learning processes, and safety of care [64]. Staff training on the topic is also critical to increase awareness of reporting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Patient Safety Culture Influences Adverse Event Reporting and Use of the Incident Reporting Tool: A Systematic Review

Cerrone¹,

Aliberti²,

Prendin³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patient safety is a top priority for all healthcare systems globally. Promoting the adoption of policies for reporting and learning from errors is an important strategy for improving care safety. Therefore, the aim of our study was to detect how much patient safety culture influences the reporting of adverse events and the use of the incident reporting tool. The study protocol was developed according to PRISMA guidelines. Articles were searched electronically in PubMed/MEDLINE, the COCHRANE library, and Google Scholar by two independent reviewers, and those that met the eligibility criteria were included. Synthesis of qualitative data from included studies was performed by graphical descriptive statistical analysis. The results of the systematic review showed that health care organizations' increasing focus on staff development of a safety culture has led to a significant increase in incident reporting rates over the years. Moreover, in situations where safety culture is placed at the top of the nations, there is a higher frequency of incident reporting. An efficient incident reporting system should be an essential foundation for healthcare organizations, as it allows them to collect experiences and data and provide feedback to healthcare providers and staff involved in care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Patient Safety Culture Influences Adverse Event Reporting and Use of the Incident Reporting Tool: A Systematic Review

Cerrone¹,

Aliberti²,

Prendin³

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LOA programs have been shown to exhibit the features of a complex sociotechnical system (Carden et al, 2017). Further, a significant number of analyses of both fatal and relatively minor injuries occurring within LOA programs have confirmed that injury incidents are a systems phenomenon which are underpinned by a network of interacting contributory factors that span the entire LOA system (see Goode et al, 2013;van Mulken et al, 2017;McLean et al, 2022;Salmon et al, 2017).…”

Section: Validity Test Case Study Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing the validity of the Networked Hazard Analysis and Risk Management System (Net‐HARMS)

Dallat

Salmon

Goode

2023

Hum Ftrs & Erg Mfg Svc

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Testing the validity of newly developed methods is a critical component of human factors and ergonomics (HFE) practice. The Networked Hazard Analysis and Risk Management System (Net-HARMS) is a recently developed systems thinking-based risk assessment method which supports the identification of task and emergent risks across overall work systems. This article reports on a validity study of the Net-HARMS method in which outputs were compared to an expert analysis developed by the first two authors of this paper, with review by subject matter experts. The findings show that individual participant performance was poor for both groups yet when both group's analyses were pooled, validity significantly improved. Further, a subject matter expert analysis of the false alarms identified by participants showed that they may in fact represent credible risks. It is concluded that the Net-HARMS method achieved high levels of validity when participants analyses are pooled. The implications for risk assessment and the validity of HFE methods are discussed.

show abstract

“…Referred to in the injury and incident analysis literature as led outdoor activities (LOA), we need to be clear that herein we are using OAL as the common no-Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership menclature for the outdoor and adventure education and leadership fields and literature (Priest & Gass, 2018) and will reference LOA in terms of the instrumentation utilized in this study and when directly referring to incident analysis literature where appropriate. The organization level of analysis has become particularly relevant given the emergence of systems-based approaches to outdoor risk management and safety (e.g., see Jackson & Heshka, 2010;Salmon et al, 2010), and indications of outdoor safety as complex, multi-leveled and sociocultural (Carden et al, 2017;Dallat et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trust, Workload, Outdoor Adventure Leadership, and Organizational Safety Climate

Jackson

Harper

McLean

2021

JOREL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The outdoor adventure leadership (OAL) field has an extensive body of work centered on individual safety performance, but much less at the organization level of analysis and assessment of organizational safety. Safety climate is a well-established construct and when measured can be indicative of employees’ perceptions of organizational safety and predictive of safety performance. This study employed a safety climate scale and surveyed 506 employees across ten United States OAL not-for-profit organizations. Dimensions of safety as a recognized value, and leadership and management for safety typically scored the highest across organizations. The Dimensions of safety as learning oriented, and safety as integrated into operations, typically scored the lowest. Trust in the organization and OAL delivery pressure, workload, and stress emerged as important indicators of safety climate at the organizational level. Directions for future research based upon this safety climate tool are identified.

show abstract

Not as simple as it looks: led outdoor activities are complex sociotechnical systems

Cited by 15 publications

References 31 publications

How Patient Safety Culture Influences Adverse Event Reporting and Use of the Incident Reporting Tool: A Systematic Review

How Patient Safety Culture Influences Adverse Event Reporting and Use of the Incident Reporting Tool: A Systematic Review

Testing the validity of the Networked Hazard Analysis and Risk Management System (Net‐HARMS)

Trust, Workload, Outdoor Adventure Leadership, and Organizational Safety Climate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About