“…In working with people for people, in giving voice to people's stories, in pursuing an ideal coherence between fairness of procedure and fairness of outcomes, in upholding values of active responsibility and accountability, of democratic participation and 'republican' universalism (Braithwaite, 2002b;Braithwaite & Parker, 1999;Braithwaite & Pettit, 1990;Pettit & Braithwaite, 2000), the deepest human and relational meaning of disputed cultural objects can be brought to the fore and become the real focus of negotiations and deliberations. Taking such a conscious restorative approach to the restitution of cultural objects can prompt a first step in a more complex and longer -and as such certainly more difficult, but also, potentially, more beneficial in the long run -path towards a broader reconciliation and a better cultural understanding between groups and peoples who are, at present, still painfully divided by deep historical, social and cultural hurts (Chechi, 2022;Mazzucato, forthcoming).…”