2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03784-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not only appendicitis: rare appendix disorders manifesting as surgical emergencies in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What we describe in this case report is the formation of an ‘appendicular ring’ by which the inflamed appendix wraps around the terminal ileum, resulting in a mechanical distal small bowel obstruction. This has previously been reported in a small subset of patients 5–9 …”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…What we describe in this case report is the formation of an ‘appendicular ring’ by which the inflamed appendix wraps around the terminal ileum, resulting in a mechanical distal small bowel obstruction. This has previously been reported in a small subset of patients 5–9 …”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In a review of 33 adults with appendiceal torsion, reported during 1918-2018, only one had an associated congenital anomaly "cecal malposition". 11,30,33 In primary torsion is hypothesized that the axial rotation is due to different possible cause: i) to abnormalities of the mesentery, such as a narrow base, as occurred in our case, ii) to the absence of azygotic folds that normally laterally fix the appendix, iii) to cecal malposition, iv) to abnormal peristaltic movements and v) to vigorous physical exercise. Secondary torsion of appendix is rarest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…With cross‐referencing, eight additional eligible articles were identified. In total, 131 articles were included in this systematic review 3,6,12–140 . Figure 1 provides the PRISMA flowchart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported indications were: N = 2 ileocaecal resection due to perforation of the caecum or fistula of the appendix into caecum, N = 1 resection of a part of ascending colon due to local lesion caused by adherent appendix, N = 1 resection terminal ileum due to adherent appendix and cystic lesion, N = 1 Meckel's diverticulum, N = 1 adherent ileal loop, N = 1 old perforation terminal ileum 44,45,69,98,124,131,135 . In one patient a diverticulectomy of a Meckel's diverticulum was performed and in three patients a Ladd's procedure 20,24,104,134 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%