1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.48.1248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on Weinberg operators in the standard model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We shall prove that in the absence of QCD radiative corrections the same mechanism leads to the cancellation of induced θ-term. In contrary to the recent claim that the Weinberg operator is zero to this approximation [7], we find that all operators of dim≥6 acquire non-vanishing values.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We shall prove that in the absence of QCD radiative corrections the same mechanism leads to the cancellation of induced θ-term. In contrary to the recent claim that the Weinberg operator is zero to this approximation [7], we find that all operators of dim≥6 acquire non-vanishing values.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The expression for the Weinberg operator (37) parametrically coincides with the effective magnetic quadrupole moment of W -boson [6] appearing in this model in the same fourth order in semi-weak constant. The attempt to prove the exact cancellation of the Weinberg operator using the external field technic [7] seems to be incorrect. The author of this work believes that antisymmetrizations of the amplitude (8) in m 1 , m 3 and m 2 , m 4 should be imposed independently and both procedures increase the effective dimension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Weinberg operator is relevant in many candidates of new physics beyond standard model such as the Higgs-doublet models [49,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69], supersymmetric models [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80], and other models [81][82][83][84][85][86][87]. The SM contribution generated by the CP phase of the CKM matrix [88] is negligibly small due to suppression by the GIM mechanism [89][90][91].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%