2015 Communication, Control and Intelligent Systems (CCIS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ccintels.2015.7437867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel hexagonal pizza shaped CPW microstrip patch antenna for applications in X band

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, microstrip line feed is employed and hence this antenna incurs reduced losses. Table 3 compares the proposed antenna with [18][19][20][21][22] for substrate type, antenna size, number of frequency bands, bandwidth and return loss. As the optimized antenna achieves highest number of frequency bands are obtained with return loss less than -10dB and hence it can be used for variety of applications such as RF energy harvesting, satellite communication etc.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, microstrip line feed is employed and hence this antenna incurs reduced losses. Table 3 compares the proposed antenna with [18][19][20][21][22] for substrate type, antenna size, number of frequency bands, bandwidth and return loss. As the optimized antenna achieves highest number of frequency bands are obtained with return loss less than -10dB and hence it can be used for variety of applications such as RF energy harvesting, satellite communication etc.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various multiple-band antennas are proposed for RF energy harvesting using CPW, microstrip line and coaxial feeding techniques [9][10][11][12]. Table 1 compares the proposed antenna's size, operational bands, and average peak gain to antennas mentioned in the literature [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The proposed quad band antenna is proven to be effective at 2.8-3.5GHz, 4.8-7.5GHz and 8.1-9.4GHz frequency bands resonating at 3.1GHz, 5.2GHz and 6.8GHz and 8.7GHz respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two variations in which patches are rotated by 30 • are investigated which yields impedance bandwidth of 100% and 108% respectively. An X-band hexagonal shaped microstrip patch antenna with impedance bandwidth ranging from 9.21 GHz to 9.38 GHz was discussed by Das et al The return loss was improved and the resonant frequency was shifted by introducing slots on the sides of the patch [3]. Hexagonal slots were introduced by Datta et al to reduce the patch size by about 80.22%; this has been simulated using Method of Moment based software IE3D [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%