2020
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab9187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Method for Monitoring the Electrochemical Capacitance by In Situ Impedance Spectroscopy as Indicator for Particle Cracking of Nickel-Rich NCMs: Part I. Theory and Validation

Abstract: Nickel-rich NCM (LiMO2, with M = Ni, Co, and Mn) cathode active materials for lithium-ion batteries are being increasingly commercialized due to their high specific capacity. However, their capacity retention upon cycling is impaired by crack formation of NCM secondary agglomerates induced by the volume change upon repeated (de)lithiation that depends on the nickel content and the cutoff potential. Particle cracking leads to loss of electrical contact and enhanced side reactions caused by an increased surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
142
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(115 reference statements)
12
142
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The better performance of the higher density cathodes at low C-rates is in accordance with Oswald et al 22 , who detected an increasing electrode capacity with rising compression and explained this by the increased electrochemically active surface area. Other researchers investigated crack formation in secondary NCM particles during the first charge and also detected an improved electrochemical performance due to increased electrochemically active surface areas and the associated reduced effective particle size.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The better performance of the higher density cathodes at low C-rates is in accordance with Oswald et al 22 , who detected an increasing electrode capacity with rising compression and explained this by the increased electrochemically active surface area. Other researchers investigated crack formation in secondary NCM particles during the first charge and also detected an improved electrochemical performance due to increased electrochemically active surface areas and the associated reduced effective particle size.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This type of particle breakage due to compression has already been described in literature. 15,22,25,26,42 Furthermore, Oswald et al 22 observed that the particle breakage in NCM622 cathodes caused by compression led to a higher specific surface area, whereby the area increased with increasing compression. Thus, it can be assumed that the increasing moisture uptake with increasing density is mainly caused by the presence of more particle cracks and breakages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To rationalize this link, a number of interconnected processes must be considered. First, the structural changes induced by cycling have been demonstrated to promote inter-particle cracking 4,6,7,43–45 (evident in the charged state even in the first cycle), 46–48 which leads to increased electrolyte accessibility within the secondary particle and enabling the formation of an O-depleted resistive surface layer (and reduced surface layer) on the primary particle surface, as proposed recently by Friedrich et al 54 and Zou et al 15 This layer hinders the transport of lithium ions and/or electrons into the particle resulting in impedance rise. 12,49 Our analysis of the particle cracking and the reduced surface layer is discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several groups have shown evidence of microscale cracking of NMC particles imaged in the charged state in the first cycle. 46–48 After the first discharge, however, the cracks are no longer observed 46 suggesting a reversible (at least initially) “breathing” of the NMC particles. In this work, electrochemically induced cracks are not visible in NMC particles imaged in the discharged state ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%