2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel method for the improvement in the evaluation of outdoor performance loss rate in different PV technologies and comparison with two other methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Online techniques rely on information routinely collected from solar modules. For example, Belluardo et al and Jordan and Kurtz have analyzed the online temporal evolution of PV degradation by continuously examining 3 time series performance metrics: (a) DC/G POA is the ratio of temperature‐corrected DC power over the plane‐of‐array irradiance (b)Performance ratio method (PR = Y G / Y R ) uses the ratio of the generated output energy ( Y G ) and the nameplate rating‐based reference output energy ( Y R ) to determine the degradation of a module …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Online techniques rely on information routinely collected from solar modules. For example, Belluardo et al and Jordan and Kurtz have analyzed the online temporal evolution of PV degradation by continuously examining 3 time series performance metrics: (a) DC/G POA is the ratio of temperature‐corrected DC power over the plane‐of‐array irradiance (b)Performance ratio method (PR = Y G / Y R ) uses the ratio of the generated output energy ( Y G ) and the nameplate rating‐based reference output energy ( Y R ) to determine the degradation of a module …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online techniques rely on information routinely collected from solar modules. For example, Belluardo et al 4 and Jordan and Kurtz 5 have analyzed the online temporal evolution of PV degradation by continuously examining 3 time series performance metrics:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its accuracy is vital to all stakeholders -utility companies, integrators, investors, and researchers (Jordan and Kurtz, 2013). Remarkable diversity in the degradation rates can be caused by different PV technologies (Belluardo et al, 2015), performance metrics (Makrides et al, 2010a), age or investigating period (Osterwald et al, 2007), construction (encapsulation, front-and back-sheet) , electrical set-up (open-circuit, short-circuit, load resistor, grid-tied) (Skoczek et al, 2009), filtering criteria (Jordan and Kurtz, 2014) and analysis techniques (Makrides et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Degradation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the degradation rate of c-Si based PV modules or systems is lower than thin film modules, although this gap is decreasing with the maturity of thin film technology after 2000 . Considering the average value of degradation rate estimated with linear regression (LR) on the PR time series data for three years, the study conducted by Belluardo et al (2015) in Italy found typical rates of 0.2%/year for c-Si based technologies, around 0.9%/year for µc-Si, 1.9%/year for CIGS, 1.4%/year for CdTe, 1.2%/year for single junction a-Si, and 1.5%/year for double junctions a-Si.…”
Section: Degradation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation