Novel pathological predictive factors for extranodal extension in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study based on tumor budding, desmoplastic reaction, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and depth of invasion

Abstract

Background Extranodal extension (ENE) is a poor prognostic factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Identifying ENE by clinical and/or radiological examination is difficult, thereby leading to unnecessary neck dissections. Currently, no definitive predictors are available for ENE. Thus, we aimed to determine the histological predictors of ENE by routine histopathological examination using biopsy and surgically resected specimens. Methods This retrospective study included 186 surgically resected OSCC and 83 matched biopsy specimens. Clinical features associated with the tumor microenvironment, including desmoplastic reaction (DR), tumor budding (TB), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin-stained primary OSCC and neck dissection specimens. These histological features were divided into two groups: DR-immature (DR-I) and DR-mature (DR-M); TB-high (TB-H) and TB-low (TB-L); and TILs-low (TILs-L) and TILs-high (TILs-H). Clinical depth of invasion (cDOI) and pathological DOI (pDOI) were adapted for biopsies and resections, respectively; DOI was evaluated as DOI > 10 mm and DOI ≤ 10 mm. The clinicopathological relationships between these histopathological features and ENE and the independent risk factors for ENE were analyzed. The histological predictors of ENE were evaluated. Results The histological status of DR, TILs, and TB present in biopsy and resection specimens showed high accuracy with that of ENE. DR-I, TILs-L, and TB-H were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, cDOI, and pDOI. Bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TB-H and pDOI > 10 mm in resections were independent factors for the presence of ENE (ENE +). The combination of TB-H/pDOI > 10 mm in resection specimens showed high specificity (91%) and accuracy (83%) regarding ENE + . Although there proved to be no independent factors in biopsies, DR-I and TILs-L were significantly associated with ENE + (p < 0.001). The combination of DR-I/TILs-L/cDOI > 10 mm in biopsies exhibited high sensitivity and specificity with ENE + (70% and 77%, respectively, p < 0.001). These histological predictors could detect even minor ENE (< 2 mm). Conclusions The tumor microenvironment status in primary OSCC was significantly associated with that of ENE, and TB-H was an independent risk factor for ENE. The histological status of DR-I/TILs-L/cDOI > 10 mm in biopsy specimens and TB-H/pDOI > 10 mm in resection specimens is a useful predictor of ENE.

The Emerging Impact of Tumor Budding in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Main Issues and Clinical Relevance of a New Prognostic Marker

“…Single cut-off: 3 buds/field [ 31 , 32 , 44 , 64 ] 4 buds/field [ 55 ] 5 buds/fields [ 16 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 29 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 43 , 53 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 63 , 64 , 67 , 69 , 71 ] 10 buds/field [ 15 , 19 , 61 , 62 ] 15 buds/field [ 24 ] …”

“…n. of HPF evaluated: 1, 5, 10 1 [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 71 , 73 , 74 ] 5 [ 15 , 33 ] 10 [ 19 , 24 , 66 …”

“…1 [ 5 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 71 , 73 , 74 ]…”

“…Magnification ×10 [ 62 ] ×20 [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 43 , 44 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 73 , 74 ] ×25 [ 15 ] ×40 [ 24 , 25 , 31 , 66 ] …”

“…Few studies have evaluated TB on incisional biopsies [ 18 , 30 , 32 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 71 ]. Several technical limitations hinder its accurate assessment, such as the small sample size, the lack of the infiltrative front, sample fragmentations, artifacts, and extensive necrosis.…”