2013
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Parameters in Patients with Predominant Back Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
129
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…spinal cord stimulation Since spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was introduced in 1967, the evolution has tried to keep pace with the demands of the chronic pain patients' needs [1,2]. Attention has now started to focus on innovative central axis targets and waveforms [3][4][5]. Theoretically, the technology was based on the gate control mechanism proposed by Melzack and Wall stating that activity in large-diameter cutaneous fibers (type Ab) inhibits the transmission of noxious information to the brain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spinal cord stimulation Since spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was introduced in 1967, the evolution has tried to keep pace with the demands of the chronic pain patients' needs [1,2]. Attention has now started to focus on innovative central axis targets and waveforms [3][4][5]. Theoretically, the technology was based on the gate control mechanism proposed by Melzack and Wall stating that activity in large-diameter cutaneous fibers (type Ab) inhibits the transmission of noxious information to the brain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although at the time of this writing it has been formally published, it was presented at the North American Neuromodulation Society Annual meeting in December 2014. Dr. Leo Kapural presented the data from the US pivotal trial that demonstrated statistical superiority for HF10 as compared to traditional SCS to treat both back and leg pain [ 6 ]. Furthermore, it mirrors the data from Europe [ 3 , 4 ] and the investigation in the United States [ 5 ] (Table 10.1 ).…”
Section: Hf10mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This known phenomenon necessitates intraoperative paresthesia mapping and requires interaction with patients during the electrode implantation procedure. However, once the stimulation frequency is increased, paresthesias disappear, whereas pain relief remains or even improves [10]. This phenomenon was observed when the stimulation frequency was increased to 10,000 Hz with 30-μs stimulation pulses and the current ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 mA [10].…”
Section: New Stimulation Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, once the stimulation frequency is increased, paresthesias disappear, whereas pain relief remains or even improves [10]. This phenomenon was observed when the stimulation frequency was increased to 10,000 Hz with 30-μs stimulation pulses and the current ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 mA [10]. Using this concept, 10-kHz stimulation was introduced into clinical practice several years ago, and is currently used outside of the USA (mainly in Europe and Australia).…”
Section: New Stimulation Paradigmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation