2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2003.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear spinodal fragmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

25
330
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(355 citation statements)
references
References 283 publications
25
330
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values agree with each other to within 3% and give an estimate of the critical temperature of bulk nuclear matter as T c = 17.9 ± 0.4 MeV. This value agrees well with theoretical predictions [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Experimental Fragment Scalingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values agree with each other to within 3% and give an estimate of the critical temperature of bulk nuclear matter as T c = 17.9 ± 0.4 MeV. This value agrees well with theoretical predictions [38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Experimental Fragment Scalingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover as the system is then located in the mechanically unstable spinodal region of the phase diagram, additional information can be found in searching for characterization of the dynamics of the phase transition, which in nuclei may proceed through nucleation or spinodal decomposition. Many theoretical predictions being in favour of the latter [5], a third signal of phase transition might be the evidence of spinodal decomposition.…”
Section: Signals Of Phase Transition : Theoretical Basesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as other equilibrium and non-equilibrium properties of nuclear matter far from its normal state [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Interpretation of the experimental results requires comparisons of data to predictions from transport models which take into account reaction dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%