1997
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.47.1.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclei Beyond the Proton Drip-Line

Abstract: The proton drip-line defines the limit at which nuclei become unbound to the emission of a proton from their ground states. Low-Z nuclei lying beyond this limit only exist as short-lived resonances and cannot be detected directly. The location of the drip-line constrains the path of nucleosynthesis in explosive astrophysical scenarios such as novae and X-ray bursters, and consequently controls the rate of energy generation. In higher-Z regions of the drip-line, the potential energy barrier resulting from the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
165
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
165
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our HFB calculations with the Gogny force predict that 131 Eu is well deformed in its ground state (Q 2 = 7 b), which can significantly decrease the proton emission half-life with respect to our estimate obtained in the model made for spherical and nearly spherical nuclei. The results, given in brackets in table 1, suggest that the main reason for the discrepancies is the value of the angular momentum used in the analysis, which is not directly measured in experiment, but deduced from the comparison of the measured proton energies and the spectroscopic factors with theoretical estimates [3,32]. A similar discussion to that based on figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our HFB calculations with the Gogny force predict that 131 Eu is well deformed in its ground state (Q 2 = 7 b), which can significantly decrease the proton emission half-life with respect to our estimate obtained in the model made for spherical and nearly spherical nuclei. The results, given in brackets in table 1, suggest that the main reason for the discrepancies is the value of the angular momentum used in the analysis, which is not directly measured in experiment, but deduced from the comparison of the measured proton energies and the spectroscopic factors with theoretical estimates [3,32]. A similar discussion to that based on figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The fundamental simplicity of the proton decay process in nuclides whose ground states are unstable to proton emission has enabled a good deal of nuclear structure information to be obtained on nuclei beyond the proton drip line [1]. The observable quantities are the proton energies and half-lives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interest has been motivated by calculations which suggest that structural properties may change significantly with a severe imbalance of neutrons and protons, compared to stable isotopes [1]. In the A = 110 region, the locus of nuclei having N = Z and the proton drip-line lie in very close proximity to each other.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%