In contrast to the insertion of the carbonyl moiety, the reactions of the enolizable ketones Me 2 CO and PhC(O)Me with [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgMe afford the enolate complexes, [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgOC(Me)�CH 2 and [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgOC(Ph)�CH 2 . The formation of [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgOC(Me)�CH 2 is of note because methyl Grignard reagents preferentially react with acetone to form tbutoxide derivatives. The hydride compound, [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgH, also reacts with acetone to yield the enolate compound, [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgOC(Me)�CH 2 , but while the overall transformation is similar to that of the methyl derivative, [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgMe, the enolate compound is not the initially formed product. Specifically, acetone undergoes preferential insertion into the Mg−H bond to generate the corresponding alkoxide, [Tism Prd i Benz ]MgOPr i , which subsequently converts to the respective enolate in the presence of excess acetone. The relative ability of the hydride and methyl compounds to undergo insertion of carbonyl compounds into the Mg−H and Mg−Me bonds has been addressed computationally, which indicates that the barrier for insertion of the carbonyl group into the Mg−H bond is lower than that for insertion into the Mg−Me bond. The molecular structures of [