2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental aluminum foam microstructure testing with the use of computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effort is necessary when a geometrical structure has to be represented. This is the case when a complete geometry of an assembly is investigated [6,7] or if a microstructure is examined, for example, for composites [8][9][10] or foams [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effort is necessary when a geometrical structure has to be represented. This is the case when a complete geometry of an assembly is investigated [6,7] or if a microstructure is examined, for example, for composites [8][9][10] or foams [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vehyl et al [6] used CT data of M-Pore sponge and closed-cell Alporas foams to create FE models of foam. Miedzin´ska et al [7] used µ-CT data for modeling open-cell aluminum foams and observed good correlation between the numerical results obtained from their model and the experimental compressive tests. Bock and Jacobi [8] employed X-ray µ-CT to acquire the geometric data for open-cell aluminum foams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Liu et al [6] investigated the failure modes of the three-dimensional porous structure with the simplified model. Furthermore, with the improvement of X-ray technology, the method of a computerized tomography scan was adopted to research the internal microstructure in metal foams [7][8][9]. Ramirez et al [10] looked at the elastoplastic deformation of open-cell foams with micro-CT, which showed better consistency agreement with experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%