Numerical assessment of the dynamic response of a URM terraced house exposed to induced seismicity

Kallioras, Stylianos; Graziotti, Francesco; Penna, Andrea

doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0495-5

Cited by 32 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Refs. [4] , [5] , [6] ). This experimental data can also provide valuable insights on the comparison between results observed for walls with that of local two-way-bending failures observed in full-scale buildings ( e.g.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main input motions used in this part of the campaign corresponded to second floor accelerograms recorded either from a building prototype tested by Graziotti et al. [8] or from a calibrated numerical model of the tested building [5] . Low amplitude random excitations (RN) were used in between test runs to identify the dynamic properties of the specimens A summary of the naming adopted and boundary conditions associated with the tested specimens can be observed in Fig.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Refs. [4], [5], [6]). The data can also be used to validate simplified analytical methods to assess the response of URM in the out-of-plane direction.The data may serve to evaluate the effectiveness of the test setup.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dataset from dynamic shake-table testing of five full-scale single leaf and cavity URM walls subjected to out-of-plane two-way bending

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides information related to the sensor measurements obtained from five different unreinforced masonry (URM) walls subjected to incremental dynamic shake-table tests at EUCENTRE, Pavia, Italy. This information has been made available to assist in the development and calibration of analytical and numerical models intended to simulate the out-of-plane (OOP) two-way bending response of URM walls. For further interpretation of the sensor recordings, and for a detailed discussion on the observed seismic performance of the specimens, the reader is referred to the article entitled “Experimental Response of URM Single Leaf and Cavity Walls in Out-Of-Plane Two-Way Bending Generated by Seismic Excitation” [1]. Videos documenting the failure of each specimen are also available on YouTube [2].

show abstract

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dataset from dynamic shake-table testing of five full-scale single leaf and cavity URM walls subjected to out-of-plane two-way bending

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…nonlinear static analysis (Milani & Valente, 2015;D'Ayala & Ansal, 2012;Endo, et al, 2017). Very few papers directly compare experimental results with the numerical outcomes for entire URM buildings subjected to seismic loading (Betti, et al, 2014;Mandirola, et al, 2016;Kallioras, et al, 2019), and none of them makes use of detailed mesoscale descriptions. It is important thus to investigate the effectiveness of this latter approach, even with regard to the possibility of calibrating material parameters with standard experimental tests and the computational feasibility of modelling large number of degrees of freedom.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mesoscale Modeling of a Masonry Building Subjected to Earthquake Loading

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The tests presented in this paper are part of a wide experimental campaign (see also other studies 12,13 ) with the aim of improving the analytical and numerical prediction of damage in URM buildings or part of them (eg, previous studies [14][15][16][17]. Sections 2 and 3 present the geometry and the experimental seismic performance of the tested roof configurations, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic vulnerability of roof systems combining URM gable walls and timber diaphragms

Tomassetti

Correia

Graziotti

et al. 2019

Earthq Engng Struct Dyn

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Typical low‐rise masonry buildings consist of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls covered with various timber roof configurations generally supported or finished by masonry gables. Post‐earthquake observations and experimental outcomes highlighted the large vulnerability of the URM gables to the development of overturning mechanisms, both because of the inertial out‐of‐plane excitation and the in‐plane timber diaphragm deformability. This paper presents the static and dynamic experimental seismic performance of three full‐scale roofs tested via quasi‐static cyclic and shake table tests. Two of them were tested as part of a whole full scale one‐storey and two‐storey building. A single‐degree‐of‐freedom (SDOF) numerical model is calibrated against experimental data and proposed for the analysis of this roof typology's dynamic behaviour. Several sets of analyses were conducted to assess the vulnerability of these structural components and to study the effect of the whole building's characteristics (eg, number of storeys and structural stiffness and strength) on the seismic performance of this roof typology.

show abstract

Numerical assessment of the dynamic response of a URM terraced house exposed to induced seismicity

Cited by 32 publications

References 44 publications

Dataset from dynamic shake-table testing of five full-scale single leaf and cavity URM walls subjected to out-of-plane two-way bending

Dataset from dynamic shake-table testing of five full-scale single leaf and cavity URM walls subjected to out-of-plane two-way bending

Mesoscale Modeling of a Masonry Building Subjected to Earthquake Loading

Seismic vulnerability of roof systems combining URM gable walls and timber diaphragms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About