2020
DOI: 10.1142/s1758825120501112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation on Mixed Mode (I-II) Fracture Propagation of CCBD Specimens Under Confining Pressure

Abstract: A new numerical method, verified by the analytical solution of the weight functions and experimental paths, is developed to evaluate the crack initiation and propagation generally in mixed mode (I-II). This numerical method combining the interaction integral method and the maximum tangential stress (MTS) criterion is based on the finite element method of secondary development. The influence of combined confining pressure and diametric forces on crack propagation trajectories for CCBD specimens are studied. It … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a new contour C set outside the contour Γ, which makes the region S closed. Then, through the divergence theorem, the line integral of Equation (1) can be further written as below [19,27,31]…”
Section: Integral and Crack Propagation Criteria 21 Two-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is a new contour C set outside the contour Γ, which makes the region S closed. Then, through the divergence theorem, the line integral of Equation (1) can be further written as below [19,27,31]…”
Section: Integral and Crack Propagation Criteria 21 Two-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the selection of the stress intensity factors and T-stresses in the auxiliary fields is different for the interaction integral, the selection of auxiliary fields in this paper is consistent with that of the Refs. [19,[32][33][34].…”
Section: Integral and Crack Propagation Criteria 21 Two-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations