1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02334201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of suspended sediment transport in tidal estuaries: A comparison between the Tagus (Portugal) and the Scheldt (Belgium-the Netherlands)

Abstract: A numerical model to simulate the transport of suspended sediment in tidal estuaries is presented. The model is applied to the two large European estuaries the Tagus (Portugal) and the Scheldt (Belgium-The Netherlands). Calculated suspended sediment concentrations compare favourably with observations in the Tagus (r = 0.84) and in the Scheldt (r= 0.73). The parametrization scheme indicates that the bottom content of fine sediment is correlated with depth in the Tagus; but a different relationship is used in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This density value, however, contrasts sharply with values of 0.16 g cm -3 calculated from laboratory data reported by DITTMANN (1987) for northern Wadden Sea mussels, and also with 1.02-1.2 gcm -3 and 0.325 g cm -3 quoted for fluid estuarine muds by TEN BRINKE andDRONKERS (1993) andPORTELA andNEVES (1994), respectively. Comparisons between different geographic areas therefore remain problematic as long as site specific bulk sediment densities are not quoted in the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Biodepositioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This density value, however, contrasts sharply with values of 0.16 g cm -3 calculated from laboratory data reported by DITTMANN (1987) for northern Wadden Sea mussels, and also with 1.02-1.2 gcm -3 and 0.325 g cm -3 quoted for fluid estuarine muds by TEN BRINKE andDRONKERS (1993) andPORTELA andNEVES (1994), respectively. Comparisons between different geographic areas therefore remain problematic as long as site specific bulk sediment densities are not quoted in the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Biodepositioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…These represent about 43% of the total estuarine surface [13]. The estuary is part of a transnational river basin with a catchment area of more than 80,000 km 2 , discharging an average annual flow of more than 12,500 hm 3 with a high sediment influx, making the estuary a turbid region [14].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first modeling study published in the 1990s presented a model to simulate suspended sediment transport in two tidal estuaries: the Scheldt (Belgium-The Netherlands) an the Tagus estuary [14]. This model application relied on a 2-dimensional regularly spaced grid (600 m resolution) for the lower estuary and adjacent coastal waters, combined with a 1-dimensional grid for the upper estuary and upstream fluvial section.…”
Section: The 1990smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the calibration parameters in a cohesive sediment transport model rely on assumptions (or 'secondary hypotheses'; cf Oreskes et al 1994) in the absence of adequate fi eld measurements. For example, u* d , u* e , and M are intrinsically diffi cult to determine in situ and are typically estimated with reference to published results from intensive mud transport studies; u* d is usually assigned a uniform value and spatialization of u* e and M is often based on an assumed down-estuary variation bounded by physically-plausible values (Tattersall et al, 2003), or according to discrete depth zones (Portela and Neves, 1994) or bed types (subtidal channel, tidal fl at, saltmarsh, etc.). Improved instrumentation makes in situ determination of w c a more practical proposition (Manning and Bass, 2006;Benson and French, 2007), although here too a submodel (with additional assumptions and parameters) is needed for temporal and spatial variation in w c outside the limits of data acquisition.…”
Section: Depth-averaged Hydrodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%