2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2017.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical radius inequalities for certain 2 × 2 operator matrices II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is devoted also to prove several new A-numerical radius inequalities of certain 2 × 2 operator matrices. Some of the obtained results cover and extend the following works [9,19,21].…”
Section: Clearly • • a Induces A Seminorm Onsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This paper is devoted also to prove several new A-numerical radius inequalities of certain 2 × 2 operator matrices. Some of the obtained results cover and extend the following works [9,19,21].…”
Section: Clearly • • a Induces A Seminorm Onsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Motivated by theoretical study and applications, there have been many generalizations of the numerical radius (e.g., see [3,6,9,15,17,19,20,26,27,28,29,34]). One of these generalizations is the A-numerical radius of an operator T ∈ B(H) defined by…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We develop upper bounds for the norm of the product of two positive operators and that of the sum of two operators. Also we show with numerical examples that these bounds improve on the bound obtained by Shebrawi [18]. Finally, as an application of these numerical radius inequalities of 2 × 2 operator matrices, we estimate bounds for the zeros of a monic polynomial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…is equivalent to the operator norm. Various numerical radius inequalities improving (1.1) have been studied in [5,10,12,[16][17][18][19]. Kittaneh [13] improved on the inequality (1.1) to prove that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%