2013
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2013.48.2.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical simulation of shaking table tests on 3D reinforced concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the symmetric version of the asymmetric test structure that was experimentally and analytically verified in the Blind Prediction Test over the course of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. In their study, Bayhan and Özdemir (2013) predicted the displacement waveform of the test structure reasonably well under four successive intensity-increasing ground motion excitations on the shake table and were ranked second out of 38 participants.…”
Section: Seismic Response Of Short- and Long-period Structuresmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is the symmetric version of the asymmetric test structure that was experimentally and analytically verified in the Blind Prediction Test over the course of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. In their study, Bayhan and Özdemir (2013) predicted the displacement waveform of the test structure reasonably well under four successive intensity-increasing ground motion excitations on the shake table and were ranked second out of 38 participants.…”
Section: Seismic Response Of Short- and Long-period Structuresmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The short-period fixed-base structure studied herein is a single-story, single-bay, three-dimensional reinforced concrete structure (Figure 7) that is identical to the structure investigated in Bayhan (2013) and Bayhan and Özdemir (2013). It is the symmetric version of the asymmetric test structure that was experimentally and analytically verified in the Blind Prediction Test over the course of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.…”
Section: Seismic Response Of Short- and Long-period Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile strength of concrete is neglected. The representative material models (Bayhan 2013) are given in Figure 4.…”
Section: Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, analytical models of a generic reference frame with rigid and flexible joints are subjected to earthquake ground motions for comparison. The efficiency of the employed model to represent the behavior of a flexible joint was previously verified with both static (Theiss 2005, Çelik and Ellingwood 2009, Hassan 2011, Park and Mosalam 2013 and shaking table tests (Yavari 2011, Bayhan 2013, Bayhan et al 2015. The variation in seismic response of the analytical models due to different modeling approaches is examined through demand parameters obtained from the dynamic analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Este tipo de concursos se han realizado desde hace décadas [2], destacando recientemente los destinados a estudiar los efectos sísmicos en pequeñas estructuras a escala real [3][4][5][6][7][8], y constituyen una manera eficaz para comparar las soluciones obtenidas mediante diferentes métodos, pudiendo contrastar así el efecto de las distintas hipótesis contempladas en cada uno. Del mismo modo, ayudan a definir las consecuencias para la seguridad estructural según el empleo de uno u otro método.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified