2000
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1532:nsotna>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at1/10°

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
341
3
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
36
341
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent POP Ž . simulations of the North Atlantic Smith et al, 2000 have shown substantial improvement in both the mean flow and eddy variability as the resolution reaches 0.18. The California Current System will be a significant point of comparison for upcoming 0.18 global ocean simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent POP Ž . simulations of the North Atlantic Smith et al, 2000 have shown substantial improvement in both the mean flow and eddy variability as the resolution reaches 0.18. The California Current System will be a significant point of comparison for upcoming 0.18 global ocean simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Figure 10 (top left) shows the time-mean kinetic energy from a global 0.1 degree simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean (Smith et al, 2000). We use this data set to determine both the boundary of the North Atlantic ocean and an appropriate density function, and then construct the CVT mesh based on this information; see (Ringler et al, 2008) for details.…”
Section: Nested Scvt Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for these dissimilarities might be the different spatial resolution in each model. Previous studies have shown that when ocean models are integrated at higher resolution, the representation of these currents is improved due to the better representation of meso-scale features (Smith et al 2000;Bryan et al 2007). This is, however, not necessarily the case for the INM model, which has the highest spatial resolution compared to the other models shown in Fig.…”
Section: Rmse Mean Bias and Variancementioning
confidence: 99%