1993
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1640090705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical solution of regularized long‐wave equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various numerical schemes for obtaining the numerical solution of the RLW equation incorporating spline functions have been set up. Finite difference methods were proposed based on both cubic and quintic splines in the papers [3,11]. Some variants of finite element and collocation methods were constructed for the RLW equation by using B-splines as weight and trial functions [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: U X (At) = 0 U X (Bt) = 0 ---And Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various numerical schemes for obtaining the numerical solution of the RLW equation incorporating spline functions have been set up. Finite difference methods were proposed based on both cubic and quintic splines in the papers [3,11]. Some variants of finite element and collocation methods were constructed for the RLW equation by using B-splines as weight and trial functions [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: U X (At) = 0 U X (Bt) = 0 ---And Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we can see that the graph shows the same behavior as in [7]. T ime Table 7: Numerical results for Example 4.1 with h = 0.1, N = 1000 and c = 0.03 with the algorithim of [4,5]. …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The initial condition is taken from the solution. Also the solution satisfy three conservation laws: Table 3 and Table 6 give C 1 , C 2 , C 3 , L ∞ and L 2 found by our method in different times for c = 0.1, 0.03 and Table 4 and Table 7 give numerical results from method in [4,5]. Figure.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations