1984
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.16.010184.000435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Solution of the Nonlinear Boltzmann Equation for Nonequilibrium Gas Flow Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For l=3, there are no collision integrals tabulated by Hirschfelder et al 10 and hence W 3 (1) was chosen. The agreement between the exact LJ collision integrals and the LJPA model is excellent once again with the maximum error being about 2.8% for W (3) (1) and 3.7% for W (4) (4). For the GSS model, the errors were computed only for 0.3 ≤ kT / LJ ≤ 400 since the error is very high outside this range.…”
Section: Fig 3 Comparison Of Collision Integral (A) Wmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For l=3, there are no collision integrals tabulated by Hirschfelder et al 10 and hence W 3 (1) was chosen. The agreement between the exact LJ collision integrals and the LJPA model is excellent once again with the maximum error being about 2.8% for W (3) (1) and 3.7% for W (4) (4). For the GSS model, the errors were computed only for 0.3 ≤ kT / LJ ≤ 400 since the error is very high outside this range.…”
Section: Fig 3 Comparison Of Collision Integral (A) Wmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For W (4) (4), the maximum error using GSS model is about 20% with the error being greater than 8% for kT / LJ ≤ 1.25. On the other hand, for W (3) (1), the maximum error using GSS model is about 22% with the error being greater than 8% for kT / LJ ≤ 90. Other values of n have not been reported here for l = 3 and l = 4 but the error trends were very similar.…”
Section: Fig 3 Comparison Of Collision Integral (A) Wmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations