2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerically produced forming limit diagrams for metal sheets with voids considering micromechanical effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hora et al (1996) proposed an improved version of the Swift criterion and applied it to the prediction of FLDs, while Brunet and Morestin (2001) used this criterion with an advanced elastic-plastic damage constitutive model and finite element analysis. Recently, Kuroda and Tvergaard (2004) studied the development of shear bands by using non-associative plasticity within the framework of a finite element analysis, while Kristensson (2006) used a micromechanical model with void effects (size and distribution in the representative volume element) to study the formability of metal sheets with voids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hora et al (1996) proposed an improved version of the Swift criterion and applied it to the prediction of FLDs, while Brunet and Morestin (2001) used this criterion with an advanced elastic-plastic damage constitutive model and finite element analysis. Recently, Kuroda and Tvergaard (2004) studied the development of shear bands by using non-associative plasticity within the framework of a finite element analysis, while Kristensson (2006) used a micromechanical model with void effects (size and distribution in the representative volume element) to study the formability of metal sheets with voids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 lists the sheet material plastic properties adopted in all the theoretical predictions discussed in the present section. From Equation 25, the initial value of the geometrical imperfection f 0 for the AISI-1012 steel sheet is equal to 0.995. Figure 13a presents linear strain-paths predictions determined as a function of the value of the plastic anisotropy coefficient at 45 0 with respect to the rolling direction.…”
Section: Limit Strains and Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 17 compares the experimental limit strains determined for the IF hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with the theoretical predictions of the M-K model based upon the Hill's quadratic 34 and Ferron's 35 yield criteria. From Equation 25 with the initial average roughness value of 0.93 mµ, the initial value of the geometrical imperfection of the M-K model f 0 is equal to 0.997. The parameters adopted in Ferron's orthotropic plasticity yield criterion were m = n = p = q = 2 and k = 0.2.…”
Section: Limit Strains and Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Al alloy sheet, the factor n av r av formability index showed a direct relationship with formability of sheet metal. As the factor n av r av increased, the formability also increased [2,27,28]. The percentage increase of n av r av index in zone 3 was found to be highest due to fully recrystallized microstructure as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Mechanical/tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 85%