2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2006001500016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O nível sérico de NT-proBNP é um preditor prognóstico em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca avançada

Abstract: M a i l i n g A d d r e s s : A n t o n i o C a r l o s P e r e i r a B a r r e t t o• R u a P i a v e , 1 0 3 -0 5 6 2 0 -0 1 0 -S ã o P a u l o , S P -B r a z i l E-mail: pereira.barretto@incor.usp. OBJECTIVETo verify if the determination of NT-proBNP values would help predict the prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF) patients. METHODSOne hundred and five subjects with average age of 52.4 years were evaluated, 66.6% of them males. Thirty-three (32.0%) subjects were outpatients and 70 (67.9%) were inpatie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate potential biological response at an individual level, results of large HF clinical trials were reviewed and expert opinions were collected. Thresholds of clinically meaningful changes were established based on the magnitude of changes associated with improvement or worsening in clinical outcomes (including mortality/morbidity) and parameter variability as follows: a 1-class change in NYHA classification, 25 a 10-point change in total MLWHFQ score, 26-29 a 50-meter change in the 6MWT, 25-30 a 1.5-mL kg min change in VO 2 max,25 a change in NT-proBNP of 35% or 300 pg/mL, whichever is greater, 31-34 a change in LVESV of 20 mL or 10%, whichever is greater, and a change in LVEF of at least 5% (absolute). 35 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate potential biological response at an individual level, results of large HF clinical trials were reviewed and expert opinions were collected. Thresholds of clinically meaningful changes were established based on the magnitude of changes associated with improvement or worsening in clinical outcomes (including mortality/morbidity) and parameter variability as follows: a 1-class change in NYHA classification, 25 a 10-point change in total MLWHFQ score, 26-29 a 50-meter change in the 6MWT, 25-30 a 1.5-mL kg min change in VO 2 max,25 a change in NT-proBNP of 35% or 300 pg/mL, whichever is greater, 31-34 a change in LVESV of 20 mL or 10%, whichever is greater, and a change in LVEF of at least 5% (absolute). 35 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%