1991
DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930100503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective quantification of stress urinary incontinence: A short, reproducible, provocative pad‐test

Abstract: To evaluate the reproducibility, sensitivity, and accuracy of a short, provocative pad-test designed for quantification of urine loss in stress urinary incontinence, 50 women underwent two separate, standardised tests. The tests were performed as part of the urodynamic examination at a bladder volume that is half of the cystometric capacity.A good correlation between the two tests was found (r = 0.94). The test was found to be provocative enough to reveal even slight stress incontinence. There were no falseneg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
50
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…19,32,43,52,80,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] The lead authors of these studies were contacted by letter and asked to provide further information. Four authors responded with all of the requested data.…”
Section: Results Of Contacting Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,32,43,52,80,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] The lead authors of these studies were contacted by letter and asked to provide further information. Four authors responded with all of the requested data.…”
Section: Results Of Contacting Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presenting individual patient data, one study reported an optimum sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.64 for the rapid exercise pad test for predicting self-reported incontinence status. 111 For the same test a second study reported a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 1.00; however, as the raw data were not presented in this paper it was not possible to pool these results. 181 A third study reported correlations of between r = 0.31 and 0.67 between the 1-hour pad test and various history questions, with the largest correlation being between the pad test and self-reported number of incontinent episodes.…”
Section: Pad Test Compared With Clinical Historymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…UI was determined with the 20-minute pad test. 15,16 Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone values were evaluated by taking blood samples.…”
Section: Assessment Of Primary and Secondary Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elde edilen verilere göre bir çal›flmada hastan›n kendi bildirdi¤i inkontinans durumunu belirlemek için h›zl› egzersizle yap›lan ped testin duyarl›l›¤› 0,87 ve özgüllü¤ü0,64 olarak bulunmufltur (35) . Bir di¤er çal›flmada duyarl›l›k 0.90, özgüllük 1.00 olarak bulunmufltur (36) .…”
Section: Geçerlili¤i Yap›lm›fl öLçek Ile Geçerlili¤i Yap›lm›fl Bir öLunclassified