1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.65.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of nonlocal interference in separated photon channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
113
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For such an implementation the delocalization of the two-photon mean position corresponds to the coherence length of the pump (up to a few meters), while the typical values are λ 0 = 2π/k 0 ≃ 700 nm and ∆x ≃ 500 µm, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]44,45 respectively.…”
Section: Fig 1: Schematics Of the Franson Interferometer (Optical Immentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For such an implementation the delocalization of the two-photon mean position corresponds to the coherence length of the pump (up to a few meters), while the typical values are λ 0 = 2π/k 0 ≃ 700 nm and ∆x ≃ 500 µm, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]44,45 respectively.…”
Section: Fig 1: Schematics Of the Franson Interferometer (Optical Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…centered at x = 0 and spread over an interval ∆x ∼ 1/∆k (the first-order coherence length of the emitted field [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] ). The state |Ψ in (1) can be seen as the state produced via two-photon emission by a three-level atom, 3 in which the decay of a high-energy level ω 0 of long lifetime yields a couple of correlated pulses having opposite polarizations and complementary energies and momenta.…”
Section: Fig 1: Schematics Of the Franson Interferometer (Optical Immentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also claimed that interference in their non-local double-slit could be described in terms of virtual path indistinguishability. Yet, this explanation is not necessary, considering that photons definitely followed independent non-intersecting paths, and the effect is known to happen even in the absence of such apertures (such as in [11,12], discussed above). Consequently, photons must have interacted from perfectly distinguishable paths, just like in the previous two experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, this is an interference process between photons from separate paths, in which we have complete fringe visibility and complete path knowledge. For example, Ou et al [11] have sent pairs of entangled photons through two independent unbalanced Michelson interferometers. Two fixed detectors were used to count the photons from each path.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%