2015
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201504631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Strong Interlayer Coupling in MoS2/WS2 Heterostructures

Abstract: Epitaxial growth of A-A and A-B stacking MoS2 on WS2 via a two-step chemical vapor deposition method is reported. These epitaxial heterostructures show an atomic clean interface and a strong interlayer coupling, as evidenced by systematic characterization. Low-frequency Raman breathing and shear modes are observed in commensurate stacking bilayers for the first time; these can serve as persuasive fingerprints for interfacial quality and stacking configurations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

25
239
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
25
239
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From our calculations ( Table 1 ) and also previous results,22 AB 1 ‐2H, AB 2 ‐2H, and AA 1 ‐3R are the stable configurations with a smaller interlayer spacing of 6.3 Å; while AA 2 ‐3R is metastable with a larger interlayer spacing of 6.8 Å. The formation energies of AB 1 ‐2H, AB 2 ‐2H, and AA 1 ‐3R is of similar strength, but much lower than in AA 2 ‐3R 21. Both AA 2 ‐3R and AB 3 ‐2H share the similar orientation and interlayer distance (6.8 Å) and hole dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From our calculations ( Table 1 ) and also previous results,22 AB 1 ‐2H, AB 2 ‐2H, and AA 1 ‐3R are the stable configurations with a smaller interlayer spacing of 6.3 Å; while AA 2 ‐3R is metastable with a larger interlayer spacing of 6.8 Å. The formation energies of AB 1 ‐2H, AB 2 ‐2H, and AA 1 ‐3R is of similar strength, but much lower than in AA 2 ‐3R 21. Both AA 2 ‐3R and AB 3 ‐2H share the similar orientation and interlayer distance (6.8 Å) and hole dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…The MX 2 materials share similar crystalline structures and symmetries, but possess distinct electronic properties in bandgaps, photoabsorption, and spin–orbit coupling strength 7, 8, 9. The heterostructures vertically reassembled from different 2D materials form even richer material systems, and thus provide a new platform for investigating new physics12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and exploring new applications 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24. The heterostructures of two MX 2 are of particular interests because many of them form type II heterojunctions,25, 26, 27 which facilitate the efficient separation of photoexcited electrons and holes28, 29 and therefore exhibit great potentials in the applications of photodetectors,30, 31 photovoltaic cells,32, 33 and light emitters 34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where σ0 is a fitting parameter, Ea is the activation energy, and kB is Boltzmann constant [34,35]. In contrast with the VRH transport at low temperature, the NNH model at high temperature is reasonable for impeding the electrical transport by twin GB which serves as the line defects, scattering centers for charge carriers that can decrease the conductivity.…”
Section: Transport Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterojunction exhibits photocurrent and incident-photon-to-current-efficiencies (IPCE) 10 times 6 higher than the films comprised of the individual constituents. We attribute this to the more efficient exciton dissociation enabled by the creation of atomically thin p-n junctions analogous to MoS 2 /WS 2 bilayer heterostructures grown via CVD, 29,30 which can occur at faster timescales than the charge carriers recombination in individual WS 2 and MoS 2 layers. 31 The charges separated states in the bulk heterojunction have also been predicted to be long-lived despite the close contiguity of electrons and holes, increasing the chance of the water oxidation reaction to occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%