2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0527-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations and Impacts from the 2010 Chilean and 2011 Japanese Tsunamis in California (USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsunami impacts in Japan were widely reported through the popular media, and field survey data indicate runup elevations in excess of 40 m (MORI et al, 2011). While the tsunami affected areas throughout the Pacific (see for example WILSON et al, 2012, and other papers in this special volume), the effects were generally insignificant compared to the ruin experienced in Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Tsunami impacts in Japan were widely reported through the popular media, and field survey data indicate runup elevations in excess of 40 m (MORI et al, 2011). While the tsunami affected areas throughout the Pacific (see for example WILSON et al, 2012, and other papers in this special volume), the effects were generally insignificant compared to the ruin experienced in Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Local topographic resonant effects were the main reason of well-expressed peaks in the observed spectra at different sites. RABINOVICH et al (2013) WILSON et al (2013) report the effects of the 2010 tsunami on the US west coast including resonant oscillations and associated strong currents within harbours. In California, the 2010 event generated a maximum tsunami amplitude of 1.2 m at Pismo Beach and caused more than $3 million damage to boats and docks in nearly a dozen harbours.…”
Section: Chile Tsunamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…170, (2013) Introduction to Historical and Recent Catastrophic Tsunamis in the World 957 management officials of the severity of the event. It is possible that these images may have prompted more urgent action, particularly in California (WILSON et al 2013). This is in contrast to the 2010 Chile tsunami that occurred in the pre-dawn hours in a society not as digitally connected as Japan.…”
Section: The 2011 Tsunami and Its Effects In Other Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar amplification was also observed at the time of the 1964 Alaska tsunami. WILSON et al (2013) report the observational aspects of the two recent tsunamis: the 2010 Chile tsunami and the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. Both arrived at the US west coast during low tide and did not cause significant inundation of dry land.…”
Section: The 2011 Tsunami and Its Effects In Other Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%