1991
DOI: 10.1193/1.1585640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on Two Seismic Strengthening Schemes for Concrete Frames

Abstract: A large-scale model of a nonductile concrete frame with columns susceptible to shear failure was retrofitted with two strengthening schemes. In the first scheme, full-height concrete piers were added to the original columns. Tests showed that the strengthened column section behaved monolithically and the failure mode was shifted to hinging of the spandrel beams. Large increases in frame strength and stiffness were also realized. In the second scheme, a steel X-bracing system was attached to the frame's exterio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengthened frame was exposed to lateral and gravity loadings and its displacements were allowed to increase by one fiftieth of the frames' original height (allowable drift). The strengthened inside frame by a ductile steel bracing demonstrated considerably better behavior than the preliminary reinforced concrete frame [11] or applied from outside the frame [12].…”
Section: Study Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The strengthened frame was exposed to lateral and gravity loadings and its displacements were allowed to increase by one fiftieth of the frames' original height (allowable drift). The strengthened inside frame by a ductile steel bracing demonstrated considerably better behavior than the preliminary reinforced concrete frame [11] or applied from outside the frame [12].…”
Section: Study Literaturementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The strengthened frame was exposed to lateral and gravity loads and its displacements were allowed to increase by one fiftieth of the frame's Original height (inter-story drift). The strengthened inside frame by a ductile steel brace, demonstrated better behavior considerably than the preliminary reinforced concrete frame (Masri and Goel 1996) or applied from outside the frame (Bush et al 1991).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In some other researches, the use of wing walls, attached to two sides of columns was investigated. The systems strengthened with wing walls exhibited ductile behaviour (Higashi et al 1982;Bush et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bracing can either be implemented inside the frame (Masri & Goel 1996) or applied from outside the system (Bush et al 1991). Post-tensioned steel bracing is also an efficient alternative for vulnerable framed buildings (Gilmore et al 1996) and it compensates structural irregularities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%