1946
DOI: 10.3171/jns.1946.3.4.0329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations upon the Management of Orbito-Cranial Wounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11) The mortality has been reported as 25% 11) and 12.5%. 15) Wooden objects are not always recognizable on roentgenograms. Diagnosis was difficult in 92% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11) The mortality has been reported as 25% 11) and 12.5%. 15) Wooden objects are not always recognizable on roentgenograms. Diagnosis was difficult in 92% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an organic material, wood absorbs water and can mimic air on CT. The Hounsfield unit (HU) of wood range between −500 and −200 HU, whereas HU of air is −1000 [9]. There was no wood in the parenchyma in our case because it came out after piercing the right orbital wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A 12% mortality rate was found among 42 patients with orbitocranial wounds treated during World War II, as reported by Webster et al . ( 9 ). Rish et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%