1985
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(85)90024-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational exposure to anticancer drugs — Potential and real hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges and urinary mutagenicity indicated that the nurses handling cytostatic drugs had an increased exposure to potentially genotoxic substances. The health impact of this exposure is unknown (20), but some studies indicate that nurses exposed to cytostatic drugs have an excess frequency of fetal loss and of malformations in their offspring (21,22). Although the matching was good in terms of smoking habits and age between the nurses handling cytostatic drugs and the referents, we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that the differences in sister chromatid exchanges and urinary mutagenicity were attributable to factors other than exposure to cytostatic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges and urinary mutagenicity indicated that the nurses handling cytostatic drugs had an increased exposure to potentially genotoxic substances. The health impact of this exposure is unknown (20), but some studies indicate that nurses exposed to cytostatic drugs have an excess frequency of fetal loss and of malformations in their offspring (21,22). Although the matching was good in terms of smoking habits and age between the nurses handling cytostatic drugs and the referents, we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that the differences in sister chromatid exchanges and urinary mutagenicity were attributable to factors other than exposure to cytostatic drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The possibility of using urinary mutagenicity or cytogenetic methods for the biomonitoring of occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs has previously been discussed by Sorsa et al (20). However, they did not compare different tests or discuss the optimal design of a study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions of these studies were often contradictory, probably because of uncertainties concerning exposure level 20) or because effective protective measures were differently adopted 21) . In a follow-up study of genotoxic hazards in pharmacists and nurses handling ANPDs carried out four years after a first study, the frequency of MN in the exposed nurses and control subjects was not found to be statistically different after improving working conditions 11) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known that many anticancer drugs have been found to be mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic in in vitro and in vivo test systems, and secondary malignancies are known to be associated with several therapeutic treatments (11). Although CP has been shown to induce genotoxic effects in a number of assay systems, limited experimental data are available on their clastogenic potential in human lymphocytes in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%