Occupational workplace and traffic fatalities in Alsace, France (2000–2005): Results of toxicological investigations

Szwarc, Esther; Tracqui, A.; Ludes, Bertrand; Cantineau, A.

doi:10.1016/j.fsisup.2009.07.003

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the 13 studies, one included two distinctive occupational groups (Szwarc et al, 2009 ), with a total of 22 estimates. Focusing on the study design, four estimates (28.6%) were based on case control studies (Montastruc and Charlet, 1992 ; Price, 2012 , 2014 ; Palmer et al, 2014 ), while remaining estimates were from cross-sectional studies (71.4%) (Girre et al, 1988 ; Currie et al, 1995 ; Trucco et al, 1998 ; Drummer et al, 2003 ; Kurzthaler et al, 2005 ; Szwarc et al, 2009 ; Orriols et al, 2011 ; Canfield et al, 2012 ; Nkyekyer et al, 2018 ). The majority of the estimates were from France (35.7%) and United States (28.6%), with two studies form the United Kingdom (14.3%), a one study from Austria, Australia, Chile (7.1% each one).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Occupational Injuries and Use of Benzodiazepines: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

Garbarino

Lanteri

Bragazzi

et al. 2021

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Benzodiazepines have been widely used in clinical practice for over four decades and continue to be one of the most consumed and highly prescribed class of drugs available in the treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. The literature indicates that Benzodiazepine users at a significantly increased risk of Motor Vehicle accidents compared to non-users but the impact on injuries at workplace is not well-defined. We aimed to investigate whether use of benzodiazepine is associated with increased risk of occupational injuries (OI).Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) among case controls, cross-sectional studies, either questionnaire or laboratory exams based.Results: A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria, involving 324,168 OI from seven different countries, with an estimated occurrence of benzodiazepine positivity of 2.71% (95% CI 1.45–4.98). A total of 14 estimates were retrieved. Of them, 10 were based on laboratory analyses, three on institutional databases, while one study was based on questionnaires. Regarding the occupational groups, three estimates focused on commercial drivers (0.73%, 95% CI 0.12–4.30), that exhibited a reduced risk ratio for benzodiazepine positivity compared to other occupational groups (RR 0.109, 95% CI 0.063–0.187). Eventually, no increased risk for benzodiazepine positivity was identified, either from case control studies (OR 1.520, 95% CI 0.801–2.885, I2 76%), or cross sectional studies, when only laboratory based estimates were taken in account (OR 0.590, 95% CI 0.253–1.377, I2 63%).Conclusions: Even though benzodiazepines have the potential to increase injury rates among casual and chronic users, available evidence are insufficient to sustain this hypothesis, particularly when focusing on laboratory-based studies (i.e., studies the characterized the benzodiazepine immediately before the event).

show abstract