“…Of the 19 included studies in this meta-analysis, 5 measured macular thickness [ 9 , 20 , 26 – 28 ], 3 measured GC-IPL layer thickness [ 10 , 29 , 30 ], 5 measured RNFL thickness [ 12 , 27 , 28 , 31 , 32 ], and 7 studies measured peripapillary RNFL thickness [ 10 , 11 , 13 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 30 ], 5 measured cup to disc ratio [ 26 – 28 , 30 , 31 ], and 12 measured choroidal thickness [ 9 , 14 , 20 , 25 – 28 , 32 – 36 ]. All the studies reported their data as mean (SD), except one that reported some of the measurements in median (min-max) [ 26 ].…”