2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12055-018-0668-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a surreal controversy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), OPCAB is performed without the use of extracorporeal circulation. This approach is considered less invasive as it mitigates side effects associated with extracorporeal circulation, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome, renal dysfunction, and respiratory complications [5]. The OPCAB procedure alters hemostatic balance, leading to reduced thrombin generation and attenuated fibrinolysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), OPCAB is performed without the use of extracorporeal circulation. This approach is considered less invasive as it mitigates side effects associated with extracorporeal circulation, such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome, renal dysfunction, and respiratory complications [5]. The OPCAB procedure alters hemostatic balance, leading to reduced thrombin generation and attenuated fibrinolysis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%