2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil project selection in Iran: A hybrid MADM approach in an uncertain environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It does not seem that individual conditions can do anything in apprehension of anticipated perceptions; therefore, the additional investigation can be appropriate for this merging procedure as a malleable method for other situations. In accretion, a recent revision vs. exercise could emphasize a legitimate understanding of other MCDM techniques comprising ARAS, ANP, and PROMETHEE in order to accrue the absolute dream of different consequences [68,[122][123][124]. e baseline contribution areas are first; this study manifested exploration-exploitation and deliberated all various manufacturing strategy characteristics and CSFs, which becomes incredibly substantial in turbulent times for the Islamic Republic of Iran.…”
Section: Discussion and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It does not seem that individual conditions can do anything in apprehension of anticipated perceptions; therefore, the additional investigation can be appropriate for this merging procedure as a malleable method for other situations. In accretion, a recent revision vs. exercise could emphasize a legitimate understanding of other MCDM techniques comprising ARAS, ANP, and PROMETHEE in order to accrue the absolute dream of different consequences [68,[122][123][124]. e baseline contribution areas are first; this study manifested exploration-exploitation and deliberated all various manufacturing strategy characteristics and CSFs, which becomes incredibly substantial in turbulent times for the Islamic Republic of Iran.…”
Section: Discussion and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such uncertainty of weight of the factors influences the quality of project selection. In this uncertain situation, the Fuzzy set theory might be used as a useful tool (Liang et al , 2019; Yazdi et al , 2020; Ma et al , 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCDM methods are most used techniques for dealing with complex problems related to weighting, prioritizing and ranking factors. MCDA techniques have been achieved optimal results in different areas such as supplier selection (Wu et al, 2019), raw material selection (Çalıs ¸kan et al, 2013) and project selection (Yazdi et al, 2020). The literature provides numerous MCDA approaches such as Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), multi-criteria optimization and compromise solution (VIKOR), Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Best and Worst Method (BWM), Weighted Product Method (WPM),Generally, the performances of MCDM approaches are judged based on expert's opinion, simplicity of the method and the application time (Chatterjee et al, 2011), because it is very difficult to choose the best and the suitable MCDM methods to resolve a studied Multi-criteria decision-making problem Framework for sustainable manufacturing (Mousavi-Nasab and Sotoudeh-Anvari, 2017;Sun and Li, 2010).…”
Section: The Performance Of Mcdm Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%