Okra / Ocra

Horvat, Jana; Bavdek, Alma

doi:10.3986/9789612545635

Cited by 8 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…21 Urleb 1983a,b in poročila 1983c;1985b. 22 Urleb 1986;Schein 2002, 290-292, 298;Horvat, Bavdek 2009.…”

Section: Zgodovina Raziskovanjmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…18), Županov spodmol (št. 19a) (Leben 1956;1971;1975a-h;Bavdek 2009). 26 Leben 1971;Leben 1978, 13-35;Gabrovec 1983, 80-87;Frelih 1992;Turk 1994;Čerče, Turk 1996, 10-11;Teržan 2016; Turk P., M. Turk 2019.…”

Section: Zgodovina Raziskovanjunclassified

“…21 Urleb 1983a,b andReports: Urleb 1981;1083c;1985b. 22 Urleb 1986Schein 2002, 290-292, 298;Horvat, Bavdek 2009. 23 Urleb, Osmuk 1979;1980;Urleb 1980. rarely to the Iron Age.…”

Section: Translationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Notranjska v pozni bronasti in starejši železni dobi

Bavdek¹

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prispevek v uvodnem delu prinaša pregled zgodovine raziskav prazgodovinskih najdišč na Notranjskem. V nadalje- vanju so predstavljene tri arheološke lokacije, ki dobro zaobjamejo pozno bronasto in starejšo železno dobo notranjske halštatske skupnosti. Strateško pozicijo v sklopu Postojnskih vrat je imela v pozni bronasti dobi ali morda še nekoliko prej naselbina na Soviču nad Postojno. Naselbina na Cvingerju pri Dolenji vasi pri Cerknici je verjetno nastala med 10. in 9. st. pr. n. št. nad ponikalnico Velika Karlovica na obrobju Cerkniškega jezera. Prispevek se zaključi s predstavitvijo najdišča na Trnovem pri Ilirski Bistrici, kjer je bilo leta 1978 raziskano grobišče. Predstavljeni so grobovi, ki nakazujejo časovni okvir pokopovanja med 9. in 6. st. pr. n. št.

show abstract

“…21 Urleb 1983a,b in poročila 1983c;1985b. 22 Urleb 1986;Schein 2002, 290-292, 298;Horvat, Bavdek 2009.…”

Section: Zgodovina Raziskovanjmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Zgodovina Raziskovanjunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Notranjska v pozni bronasti in starejši železni dobi

Bavdek¹

2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…See Šašel Kos, 2000: 294–5. On the road linking Aquileia and Nauportus, via Tergeste, Mount Nanos/Monte Re and the outpost at the pass of Razdrto, see Horvat and Bavdek, 2009: 144–5; Zanier, 2013: 591; and Magnani, 2014: 243. On the road network around Tergeste see Degrassi, 2014.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Buora and Magnani (2011) provide a valuable overview of the cluster of kilns that are attested immediately to the north of Aquileia, along the road leading up to Noricum. Horvat and Bavdek (2009: 141–7) offer the fullest discussion of road networks in the region in antiquity.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Caesar's Aims in Northeast Italy

Santangelo¹

2016

Pap. Br. Sch. Rome

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides a new assessment of Caesar's activity in north-east Italy, both in the 50s BC and in the aftermath of the Civil War, and discusses it against the background of the earlier Roman presence in the region and of the developments that intervened in the following generation. Its main contention is that Caesar carried out a number of important political and administrative interventions, both in Histria (chiefly through the foundation of the colony of Pola) and in the Alpine and pre-Alpine regions, marking a fundamental shift in the quality of the Roman presence in the area. The discussion falls under five headings: the value of the evidence of Caesar's Commentarii for his activity in north-east Italy; an overview of the problems for which inadequate documentation survives (such as the early history and legal status of Tergeste); the date and background of the colonisation of Pola; the changes in the administrative and agrarian setup of Histria and north-east Italy in the late Republican period; and the resulting economic and social developments in the region.The conclusions summarise the main insights emerging from a very fragmentary field of evidence, and seek to explain the inclusion of Histria in the Augustan discriptio of Italy with the exceptional prosperity of the region, which Caesar's interest had contributed to chart and exploit more effectively.It is well known that Julius Caesar had a major impact on Northern Italy, not merely because of the citizenship grant he bestowed on Transpadana in 49 BC, but more widely through the activity he carried out during his provincial command over the preceding decade. However, his work in the north-eastern fringes of the region has received comparatively less attention.A treatment of Caesar's impact on north-east Italy entails at least two preliminary problems.Much of what will be discussed in what follows will pertain to the last few years of Caesar's life, and will involve reconsidering one of the most intensely debated and least satisfactorily documented issues in ancient history: the ambitions that Caesar entertained and the objectives that he pursued, especially after his victory in the Civil War, as well as the factors that informed his strategy on a number of fronts. Moreover, the notion of north-east Italy requires some qualification. It retains its validity, of course, as a 'geographischer Ausdruck', a 'geographical expression', to borrow Prince Metternich's famous dictum, in the study of any historical period. However, it is far from apparent that in Caesar's time the territory on which this study will predominantly focus was regarded as part of Italia.The analysis developed in this paper reflects the highly fragmentary nature of the surviving body of evidence, and falls under five headings. It will open with a survey of the evidence for Caesar's activity in north-east Italy during his governorship (58-50 BC), and will then engage with some important, if woefully under-documented, aspects of the history of region at this time: the coexistence be...

show abstract

Grociana piccola: a rare example of Republican military fortifications in Italy

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent investigations at Grociana piccola, a site in northeastern Italy consisting of two sub-rectangular fortifications, offer the rare opportunity to investigate Early Roman military architecture outside the Iberian peninsula. Excavations have revealed an inner rubble masonry rampart dated to the 2nd c. BCE by associated pottery, mainly amphora remains. This date suggests that the fortification was in use during the first Roman conquest and/or later campaigns of the 2nd c. BCE, providing one of the earliest and smallest examples of a military fort. The fort's ramparts were built using the same building technique as much larger 2nd-c. BCE military camps. Another trench uncovered the northeastern corner of the outer rampart and a probable tower or artillery platform which can be connected to a temporary camp built during the mid-1st c. BCE.

show abstract

Okra / Ocra

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Notranjska v pozni bronasti in starejši železni dobi

Notranjska v pozni bronasti in starejši železni dobi

Caesar's Aims in Northeast Italy

Grociana piccola: a rare example of Republican military fortifications in Italy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About