2021
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1898945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old biomarkers in tuberculosis management: are they still useful? a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These four biomarkers are CRP, IL-6, IP-10, and TNF-α. CRP was the first to appear and is now in clinical use as an adjunct to the diagnosis of TB and to determine the efficacy of anti-TB therapy ( Fusani et al, 2021 ). IL-6 and IP-10 have considerable potential to diagnose tuberculosis, and biologic companies already exist to develop related products ( Zimmer et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four biomarkers are CRP, IL-6, IP-10, and TNF-α. CRP was the first to appear and is now in clinical use as an adjunct to the diagnosis of TB and to determine the efficacy of anti-TB therapy ( Fusani et al, 2021 ). IL-6 and IP-10 have considerable potential to diagnose tuberculosis, and biologic companies already exist to develop related products ( Zimmer et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also underlined the importance of CRP as a discrimination factor between culture-positive and culture-negative specimens ( 47 ). Moreover, CRP proved higher accuracy and specificity when evaluated as a TB case-finding test in comparison with WHO-4-SS ( 12 , 47 ). Although CRP does not identify drug resistance, its potential clinical relevance as a screening test in PTB patients and as a reliable tool in monitoring treatment outcomes justifies the concept of our study ( 48 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A sputum-smear negative and/or negative culture does not always exclude TB diagnosis and may lead to wrong TB management ( 7 9 ); this accelerated the use of Xpert Gene MTB/RIF automated rapid molecular assay, which is less sensitive than culture (92%), as a more sensitive method than sputum-smear microscopy for fast identification of PTB as well as rapid assessment of rifampicin susceptibility ( 6 , 10 , 11 ). However, available diagnostic tests and mycobacterial cultures are rather time-consuming compared to point-of-care tests and also require both logistical measures and experienced personnel in order to properly diagnose TB ( 12 , 13 ). Although GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is preferred as a diagnostic tool in HIV-positive individuals due to higher sensitivity compared to smear microscopy and faster results compared to mycobacterial culture ( 14 ), it imposes various demands such as constant connection to electricity, proper temperature flow, and dedicated personnel to ensure installation functionality in comparison with rapid serological assays ( 13 , 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations