2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12078-019-09259-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olfaction During Pregnancy and Postpartum Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study are in accord with most of the literature on women's sense of smell during pregnancy. Despite anecdotal evidence and self‐reported data, studies based on objective olfactory assessment do not confirm changes in olfactory sensitivity in pregnancy (Albaugh et al., 2022 ; Cameron, 2007 , 2014 ; Fornazieri et al., 2019 ; Gilbert & Wysocki, 1991 ; Kölble et al., 2001 ; Laska et al., 1996 ). Here, we strengthen these findings by demonstrating no differences in electrophysiological response to olfactory stimuli in pregnant versus non‐pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study are in accord with most of the literature on women's sense of smell during pregnancy. Despite anecdotal evidence and self‐reported data, studies based on objective olfactory assessment do not confirm changes in olfactory sensitivity in pregnancy (Albaugh et al., 2022 ; Cameron, 2007 , 2014 ; Fornazieri et al., 2019 ; Gilbert & Wysocki, 1991 ; Kölble et al., 2001 ; Laska et al., 1996 ). Here, we strengthen these findings by demonstrating no differences in electrophysiological response to olfactory stimuli in pregnant versus non‐pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, to date, no studies among the few conducted with standardized and validated olfactory tests like the Sniffin’ Sticks (Hummel et al., 1997 ; Oleszkiewicz et al., 2019 ) or the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT; Doty et al., 1984 ) have demonstrated an enhancement in olfactory function in pregnancy, while some indicated olfactory impairment or hyposmia (Ochsenbein‐Kölble et al., 2007 ; Savovic et al., 2002 ; Şimşek et al., 2021 ; Tan et al., 2020 ; Yasar et al., 2016 ). On the other hand, several studies reported no differences in any olfactory measure between pregnant and non‐pregnant women (Cameron, 2007 , 2014 ; Fornazieri et al., 2019 ; Gilbert & Wysocki, 1991 ; Kölble et al., 2001 ; Laska et al., 1996 ). Recently, Albaugh et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women with morning sickness perceive the smell of food to be unpleasant. This does not necessarily correspond to a lowered threshold of olfactory senses; discrimination ability is undermined for some odorant stimuli ( 71 ). Unusual olfactory perception in ASC seems to be similar, reflecting a hyperreaction to perceived stimuli, but not necessarily the manifestation of heightened sensitivity ( 76 ).…”
Section: Expectation Mismatch On Perceptual Input Will Lead To Uneven...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the research done by Fornazieri et all, in 2019 [21], the results of studies in pregnant and puerperal women, and non-pregnant women, were taken into consideration. The examination was performed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).…”
Section: -The Influence Of Pregnancy On Olfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fornazieri [21] shows ratings of the pleasantness and intensity of common odors, such as coffee, smoke, clove and baby powder smells between medical examinations, pregnant, and postpartum women. It showed that only coffee and clove were rated differently between pregnant and nonpregnant women; coffee, as less pleasant in the first trimester and more intense in the puerperium, second and third trimester, and clove as less pleasant in the second trimester.…”
Section: -The Influence Of Pregnancy On Olfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%