On a martensitic phase transformation in zirconia (ZrO2)—II. Crystallographic aspects

Bansal, G. K.; Heuer, A. H.

doi:10.1016/0001-6160(74)90093-5

Cited by 120 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The existence of (100)m and (001)m twining planes was confirmed in experimental observations of Bansal and Heuer [111,112] and Buljan et al [113] respectively. Simha [114] calculations also derived similar conclusions.…”

Section: Simulation Results and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 55%

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zirconia based ceramics are strong, hard, inert, and smooth, with low thermal conductivity and good biocompatibility. Such properties made zirconia ceramics an ideal material for different applications form thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) to biomedicine applications like femoral implants and dental bridges. However, this unusual versatility of excellent properties would be mediated by the metastable tetragonal (or cubic) transformation to the stable monoclinic phase after a certain exposure at service temperatures. This transformation from tetragonal to monoclinic, known as LTD (low temperature degradation) in biomedical application, proceeds by propagation of martensite, which corresponds to transformation twinning. As such, tetragonal to monoclinic transformation is highly sensitive to mechanical and chemomechanical stresses. It is known in fact that this transformation is the source of the fracture toughening in stabilized zirconia as it occurs at the stress concentration regions ahead of the crack tip.This dissertation is an attempt to provide a kinetic-based model for tetragonal to monoclinic transformation in zirconia. We used the phase field technique to capture the temporal and spatial evolution of monoclinic phase. In addition to morphological patterns, we were able to calculate the developed internal stresses during tetragonal to monoclinic transformation. The model was started form the two dimensional single crystal then was expanded to the two dimensional polycrystalline and finally to the three dimensional single crystal. The model is able to predict the most physical properties associated with tetragonal to monoclinic transformation in zirconia including: morphological patterns, transformation toughening, shape memory effect, pseudoelasticity, surface uplift, and variants impingement. The model was benched marked with several experimental works. The good agreements between simulation results and experimental data, make the model a reliable tool for predicting tetragonal to monoclinic transformation in the cases we lack experimental observations.

show abstract

Section: Simulation Results and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 55%

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among the listed only the relation (1) has been observed experimentally earlier [31,33,[35][36][37][38]. The relation (3) has been suggested by Bailey [31], but no experimental evidence of its existence has been reported.…”

Section: (013) and T(116)mentioning

confidence: 96%

HRTEM observation of the monoclinic-to-tetragonal m-t) phase transition in nanocrystalline ZrO₂

Kasatkin

Girgsdies

Ressler

et al. 2004

Journal of Materials Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…l c, which includes three sets of diffraction patterns, namely, M-phase, Tphase and its twin. The orientation relationship between the two phases is indexed as follows: [1 00]tll [1]-0], (00 1)tlI(00 lm), which is quite different from previous studies [2][3][4]. This kind of orientation relationship of stress-induced T ~ M transformation is rather complicated and is determined by many factors such as grain size, temperature and transformation mechanism.…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

HREM investigation of interface between tetragonal and monoclinic phases in a ZrO2(3mol %Y2O3) ceramic

et al. 1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On a martensitic phase transformation in zirconia (ZrO2)—II. Crystallographic aspects

Cited by 120 publications

References 9 publications

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

HRTEM observation of the monoclinic-to-tetragonal m-t) phase transition in nanocrystalline ZrO₂

HREM investigation of interface between tetragonal and monoclinic phases in a ZrO2(3mol %Y2O3) ceramic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

On a martensitic phase transformation in zirconia (ZrO2)—II. Crystallographic aspects

Cited by 120 publications

References 9 publications

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

Phase field modeling of the tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transformation in zirconia

HRTEM observation of the monoclinic-to-tetragonal m-t) phase transition in nanocrystalline ZrO2

HREM investigation of interface between tetragonal and monoclinic phases in a ZrO2(3mol %Y2O3) ceramic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

HRTEM observation of the monoclinic-to-tetragonal m-t) phase transition in nanocrystalline ZrO₂