2004
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2004.831674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Ambiguities in Super-Resolution Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(4)), some researchers have considered reversing the order by first applying the blurring and then the warping [171], [212], [234]. It is discussed in [171] and [212] that the former coincides more with the general imaging physics (where the camera blur is dominant), but it may result in systematic errors if motion is being estimated from the LR images [171], [214].…”
Section: Imaging Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4)), some researchers have considered reversing the order by first applying the blurring and then the warping [171], [212], [234]. It is discussed in [171] and [212] that the former coincides more with the general imaging physics (where the camera blur is dominant), but it may result in systematic errors if motion is being estimated from the LR images [171], [214].…”
Section: Imaging Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4)), some researchers have considered reversing the order by first applying the blurring and then the warping [171], [212], [234]. It is discussed in [171] and [212] that the former coincides more with the general imaging physics (where the camera blur is dominant), but it may result in systematic errors if motion is being estimated from the LR images [171], [214]. However, some other researchers have mentioned that these two operations can commute and be assumed as block-circulate matrices, if the point spread function is space invariant, normalized, has nonnegative elements, and the motion between the LR images is translational [156], [157], [158], [186], [588], [610].…”
Section: Imaging Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, y (蟻) . It is important to note that there is another observation model commonly used in the literature (e.g., [34][35][36][37]). The only difference is that the order of warping and blurring operations is reversed; that is,…”
Section: Observation Model For Super-resolution Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where G i , which is generally different from F i [31], denotes the warping operator for the blurred image Bf . There are algorithms, adopting a fusion-deblur [5] or an interpolationrestoration [13] scheme for SRR; these algorithms are also based on the blurring-warping imaging process in (2).…”
Section: Model Analysis: From Complex To Simplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two important reasons for such a choice: First model (2) describes the real imaging process for the case when the dominant blur is either the atmospheric turbulence or the motion blur as in satellite imaging or aerial photography [13]. Second Wang and Qi [31] have shown that, even if the real imaging process is the warping-blurring (1) (in the case when the camera blur is dominant), model (2) is still preferable when the motion has to be estimated from the LR images.…”
Section: The Separable Srr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%