2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Cosmic Ray Modulation Beyond the Heliopause: Where Is the Modulation Boundary?

Abstract: Two of the paradigms in modeling the transport of galactic cosmic rays are that the modulation boundary is the heliopause and that the local interstellar spectra are identical to the galactic cosmic ray spectra. Here we demonstrate that the proton spectrum is already modulated due to an altered interstellar diffusion in the outer heliosheath as a consequence of the heliospheric "obstacle" in the interstellar flow. The main modulation effect however is adiabatic energy losses during a "confinement time" of cosm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, one has to keep in mind, however, that the precise form of the low-energy LIS and its connection to the Galactic spectrum on a kpc scale is still unclear and depends on modulation effects in the heliosphere, as well as on similar effects in the local solar system environment (see, e.g., the discussion in Scherer et al 2011). Furthermore, the assumed break in the diffusion coefficient may be different or even absent in a more complete propagation scenario, since up to now it has mainly been phenomenologically motivated, to yield the expected local spectra.…”
Section: The Resulting Spatial and Spectral Cr Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, one has to keep in mind, however, that the precise form of the low-energy LIS and its connection to the Galactic spectrum on a kpc scale is still unclear and depends on modulation effects in the heliosphere, as well as on similar effects in the local solar system environment (see, e.g., the discussion in Scherer et al 2011). Furthermore, the assumed break in the diffusion coefficient may be different or even absent in a more complete propagation scenario, since up to now it has mainly been phenomenologically motivated, to yield the expected local spectra.…”
Section: The Resulting Spatial and Spectral Cr Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where exactly in spatial terms does the modulation begin? Recently, Scherer et al (2011) argued that the solar modulation of galactic CRs might start beyond the HP which so far has always been considered the modulation boundary. Since these issues cannot yet be settled, we continue to simply assume the HP as the boundary where the modulation of galactic CR modulation essentially starts, assumed for this work to be at 120 AU.…”
Section: Together With the Question Of What Exactly The Very Lis Is Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, different LIS models can produce the observed spectrum with LIS model-dependent modulation parameters [Herbst et al, 2010]. Furthermore, recent studies show that remarkable modulation exists in the outer heliosphere and even beyond the heliopause [e.g., Scherer et al, 2011;Strauss et al, 2013]. And the outer heliospheric structure and boundary of the dynamic heliosphere also change associated with the varying solar activity [Zank and Müller, 2003;Scherer and Fahr, 2003;Pogorelov et al, 2009].…”
Section: Modulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%