On Data Reliability Assessment in Accounting Information Systems

Abstract

The need to ensure reliability of data in information systems has long been recognized. However, recent accounting scandals and the subsequent requirements enacted in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have made data reliability assessment of critical importance to organizations, particularly for accounting data. Using the accounting functions of management information systems as a context, this paper develops an interdisciplinary approach to data reliability assessment. Our work builds on the literature in accounting and auditing, where reliability assessment has been a topic of study for a number of years. While formal probabilistic approaches have been developed in this literature, they are rarely used in practice. The research reported in this paper attempts to strike a balance between the informal, heuristic-based approaches used by auditors and formal, probabilistic reliability assessment methods. We develop a formal, process-oriented ontology of an accounting information system that defines its components and semantic constraints. We use the ontology to specify data reliability assessment requirements and develop mathematical-model-based decision support methods to implement these requirements. We provide preliminary empirical evidence that the use of our approach improves the efficiency and effectiveness of reliability assessments. Finally, given the recent trend toward specifying information systems using executable business process models (e.g., business process execution language), we discuss opportunities for integrating our process-oriented data reliability assessment approach—developed in the accounting context—in other IS application contexts.

Modeling Concepts for Internal Controls in Business Processes – An Empirically Grounded Extension of BPMN

“…14 out of 17 experts in our interviews state that control means should be directly integrated into process models as a special activity to facilitates the assessment of processes from an ICS perspective [9]. Hence, although there are semantic differences, for audit purposes control means can be represented as an atomic activity in a process model [33,34]. However, surveys among auditors reveal that flowcharts and PMLs are only used by a minority of the auditors.…”

A Context-Based Approach to Reconciling Data Interpretation Conflicts in Web Services Composition

“…Ontology is a collection of concepts and the relationships between these concepts. Ontologies are often used for Web query processing (Storey et al 2008), Web services composition (Mrissa et al 2007), and data reliability assessment (Krishnan et al 2005). In practice, there are various types of ontologies ranging from lightweight, rather informal, to heavyweight, more formal ones (Wache et al 2001).…”

Financial Accounting Standards Should Not Matter: It's Just a Layer

“…The purpose of the paper is to illustrate how Chan and Vasarhelyi's (2011) stages of continuous auditing might be instantiated in a highly automated procure-to-pay process using the Krishnan et al (2005) notation for representing controls in business process diagrams. In stage 1, existing processes and controls are examined to identify the monitoring and testing that is suitable for continuous auditing and confirms sufficient data access.…”