1970
DOI: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1970.tb00313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Intrauterine Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
178
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 614 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Birthweight was expressed as a percentage of the Dutch population mean, corrected for sex and gestational age, and as a weight centile [30]. Maternal BMI before the second pregnancy, maternal age at birth of the second child, and time elapsed between the first and second births were calculated from the data in the records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birthweight was expressed as a percentage of the Dutch population mean, corrected for sex and gestational age, and as a weight centile [30]. Maternal BMI before the second pregnancy, maternal age at birth of the second child, and time elapsed between the first and second births were calculated from the data in the records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined the birthweight ratio as the quotient of the actual birthweight of the infant and the expected birthweight on the 50th percentile of the Dutch intrauterine growth curve for singleton pregnancies corrected for gestational age, sex and parity [13]. All twin placentae were macroscopically and histologically examined, but investigations to establish zygosity such as blood group determination or HLA tissue typing were not routinely done.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maternal age ranged between 16 and 43 years (median 28 years). All pregnancies were uncomplicated and resulted in a term delivery of normal infants with a birth weight between the 10th and 90th centiles, corrected for maternal parity and fetal sex 9 . Women were selected according to five gestational age subgroups (10-11 weeks, n = 12; 12-13 weeks, n = 12; 14-15 weeks, n = 12; 16-17 weeks, n = 10; 18-19 weeks, n = 9) to guarantee a homogeneous distribution.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%