On Modeling Concrete Compressive Strength Data Using Laplace Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution Assuming Contaminated Information

Abstract

Compressive strength is a well-known measurement to evaluate the endurance of a given concrete mixture to stress factors, such as compressive loads. A suggested approach to assess compressive strength of concrete is to assume that it follows a probability model from which its reliability is calculated. In reliability analysis, a probability distribution’s reliability function is used to calculate the probability of a specimen surviving to a certain threshold without damage. To approximate the reliability of a subject of interest, one must estimate the corresponding parameters of the probability model. Researchers typically formulate an optimization problem, which is often nonlinear, based on the maximum likelihood theory to obtain estimates for the targeted parameters and then estimate the reliability. Nevertheless, there are additional nonlinear optimization problems in practice from which different estimators for the model parameters are obtained once they are solved numerically. Under normal circumstances, these estimators may perform similarly. However, some might become more robust under irregular situations, such as in the case of data contamination. In this paper, nine frequentist estimators are derived for the parameters of the Laplace Birnbaum-Saunders distribution and then applied to a simulated data set and a real data set. Afterwards, they are compared numerically via Monte Carlo comparative simulation study. The resulting estimates for the reliability based on these estimators are also assessed in the latter study.

A New Exponential Distribution to Model Concrete Compressive Strength Data

“…This is because as the sample size raises, more additional information is collected. The dataset presents the high-performance concrete compressive strength, which is originally provided by Yeh [25] and analyzed recently by Alam and Nassar [26]. The dataset was established from 17 various sources to inspect the reliability of a proposed strength model.…”