On question-begging and analytic content

Elgin, Samuel Z.

doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1669-4

Synthese

2018

DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1669-4

|View full text |Cite

On question-begging and analytic content

Samuel Z. Elgin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The idea of content parthood has been studied by logicians normally in a logic for analytic containment. See, e.g.,Angell (1989),Correia (2004),Fine (2016),Elgin (2020).Russell (1918: 37ff., 47ff.) andWittgenstein (1921: 4.21, 4.221, 4.51, 5, 5.01, 5.3) also drew a similar distinction among propositions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A puzzle about epistemic value and steps towards a solution

Perrine

2021

Synthese

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper exposits and makes steps towards solving a puzzle about epistemic value. The puzzle is that several principles about the epistemic value of true beliefs and epistemic disvalue of false beliefs are, individually, plausible but, collectively, contradictory. My solution claims that sometimes false beliefs are epistemically valuable. I nonetheless show how my solution is not in deep tension with the Jamesian idea that true beliefs are epistemically valuable and false beliefs are epistemically disvaluable. I conclude by indicating how the results here are relevant to formulating and defending Veritism.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A puzzle about epistemic value and steps towards a solution

Perrine

2021

Synthese

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Knowledge is closed under analytic content

Elgin

2021

Synthese

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I am concerned with epistemic closure—the phenomenon in which some knowledge requires other knowledge. In particular, I defend a version of the closure principle in terms of analyticity; if an agent S knows that p is true and that q is an analytic part of p, then S knows that q. After targeting the relevant notion of analyticity, I argue that this principle accommodates intuitive cases and possesses the theoretical resources to avoid the preface paradox.

show abstract

Partial understanding

Zavaleta

2023

Synthese

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

On question-begging and analytic content

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

A puzzle about epistemic value and steps towards a solution

A puzzle about epistemic value and steps towards a solution

Knowledge is closed under analytic content

Partial understanding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About