2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On sharp-interface level-set method for heat and/or mass transfer induced Stefan problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more convenient for certain applications [1,7,8] to use front normal speed, S , for propagating the interface rather than a continuum velocity. In such problems, the level set function can be advected using Eq.…”
Section: Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more convenient for certain applications [1,7,8] to use front normal speed, S , for propagating the interface rather than a continuum velocity. In such problems, the level set function can be advected using Eq.…”
Section: Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capturing approaches use a fixed mesh. This is the case for the level set approach Chen et al [1997], Shaikh et al [2016] and the extended finite element method Merle and Dolbow [2002], Ji et al [2002], He et al [2021].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin and Blanchette [29] performed numerical simulations to study the partial coalescence in presence of surfactant. Ghost Fluid Method (GFM), proposed by Fedkiw et al [25,26], models the surface tension more realistically as surface force (used as an interfacial jump conditions while solving the pressure Poisson equation) that leads to a reduction in spurious currents near the interface; reported for the other methods that models the surface tension as a volumetric force [27,28]. Along with the fixed grid methods such are LS, VOF and CLSVOF for the multiphase flow, there are certain methods on moving grids such as arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) (Kamran et al [30]), purely Lagrangian (Saksono and Peric [31]), and embedded Eulerian-Lagrangian (Jarauta et al [32]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%