2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2015.7218402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the accuracy of smartphone-based mobile network measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the measured variances with the results by Li et al [26], the variances are similar. For the Nexus 5 ±2.331 ms for an RTT of 20 ms and ±0.811 ms for an RTT of 50 ms were determined for processing data packets received on the WiFi interface.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Observed Variances On-device Overheadsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the measured variances with the results by Li et al [26], the variances are similar. For the Nexus 5 ±2.331 ms for an RTT of 20 ms and ±0.811 ms for an RTT of 50 ms were determined for processing data packets received on the WiFi interface.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Observed Variances On-device Overheadsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Network operations on mobile devices cause an additional, device internal delay, stemming from kernel and operating system processing the outgoing and incoming packets [26]. This delay is different depending on the chosen measurement implementation (e.g.…”
Section: Measurement Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results for the other two phones (not shown here) are very similar. While we agree on the main claims of [29] about overheads, we believe that different technologies require specific tests to evaluate their performance. Thus, each interface should be calibrated separately.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A few recent papers [15,16] studied endto-end achievable throughput, also accounting for inter-arrival times and passive monitoring techniques, but without comparing their findings with ground-truth readings. The accuracy of WiFi measurements performed by mobile phone is studied in [29] based on a timing analysis. However, their results cannot be applied to our scenario for two reasons: WiFi and LTE differs significantly in terms of scheduling and MAC protocols, and tcpdump traces do not provide a reliable ground truth for the physical radio link.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we discuss below, such delay can potentially impact the accuracy of our method. An attempt to measure a similar delay is presented in [15]. The authors try to measure the delay between the arrival of an IP packet at the WiFi interface, and its registration in the kernel.…”
Section: B Measurement Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%