2011
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.611397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the effect of testing uncertainties in the homologation tests of motorcycle helmets according to ECE 22.05

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the energy-absorbing liners, there is no substantial difference between the different types of helmets. Helmet standards are also similar, with similar impact test configurations and energies [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding the energy-absorbing liners, there is no substantial difference between the different types of helmets. Helmet standards are also similar, with similar impact test configurations and energies [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One impact point was selected for this study: the "forehead" of the helmet. The calculations were carried out with a finite element model of the helmet developed at Università degli Studi di Firenze [38] on the LS-DYNA explicit solver. The impact test is calculated for 29.9 ms and the outputs are written every 0.1 ms.…”
Section: Helmet Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations provided results contained within the limits prescribed by the regulation. In the same way the Economic Community of Europe (ECE) 22.05 [12] standard was used to calibrate the helmet FE model (about 9000 elements) [34].…”
Section: MC Ov Dummy and Helmetmentioning
confidence: 99%