Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. ICDAR '99 (Cat. No.PR00318) 1999
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.1999.791887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the evaluation of document analysis components by recall, precision, and accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
45
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 12, we show the detection accuracy of both stateless and stateful IODetectors. We report the average detection results, including detection precision and recall [Junker et al 1999], in different scenarios. The overall detection accuracy of the stateless IODetector is about 85%.…”
Section: System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 12, we show the detection accuracy of both stateless and stateful IODetectors. We report the average detection results, including detection precision and recall [Junker et al 1999], in different scenarios. The overall detection accuracy of the stateless IODetector is about 85%.…”
Section: System Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to significant bleed-through removal while still respecting the original ink, our method clearly outperforms previous algorithms. While small datasets should be interpreted with care [8], our results so far are very promising.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Precision and recall defined in [6] are used as the comparison metrics. We carried out our tests on 30 documents images.…”
Section: Ocr Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%