On the ideological consistency between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation

Mirisola, Alberto; Sibley, Chris G.; Boca, Stefano; Duckitt, John

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.006

Cited by 47 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The DPM states that the association between SDO and RWA and the direction of their causal effect on one another should depend upon the social context (Duckitt, 2001;Mirisola, Sibley, Boca, & Duckitt, 2007). Our results thus support the argument that SDO (and not RWA) should have been the primary ideological dimension salient during our sample time-frame, most likely because of the increased salience of economic uncertainty and resource-scarcity.…”

Section: Overview Of Predicted Longitudinal Effectssupporting

confidence: 81%

The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

Sibley

Duckitt

2013

The Journal of Social Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study tested the pathways between personality, social worldviews, and ideology, predicted by the Dual Process Model (DPM) of ideology and prejudice. These paths were tested using a full cross-lagged panel design administered to a New Zealand community sample in early 2008 (before the effects of the global financial crisis reached New Zealand) and again in 2009 (when the crisis was near its peak; n = 247). As hypothesized, low openness to experience predicted residualized change in dangerous worldview, which in turn predicted right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). Low agreeableness predicted competitive worldview, which in turn predicted social dominance orientation (SDO). RWA and SDO also exerted unexpected reciprocal effects on worldviews. This study provides the most comprehensive longitudinal test of the DPM to date, and was conducted during a period of systemic instability when the causal effects predicted by the DPM should be, and were, readily apparent.

show abstract

Section: Overview Of Predicted Longitudinal Effectssupporting

confidence: 81%

The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

Sibley

Duckitt

2013

The Journal of Social Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Within a social-cognition framework, a different literature has focussed on the ideological polarisation currently characterising many developed democracies [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72]. Most of this work has been carried out within English-speaking countries and is particularly suitable to the Australia setting [19,73,74].…”

Section: Analysis: Interpreting Our Results Within Common Narratives mentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizens’ Views of Australia’s Future to 2050

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In four focus group exercises involving both forecasting and backcasting approaches, we gave approximately 100 Australian citizens the opportunity to discuss likely, desirable and feared futures to 2050. The image they paint is both coherent and consistent. Education, governance, personal attitudes and societal trends, rather than specific events, are drivers of a future which is perceived as being largely shaped by human choices. Innovation is believed to be more necessary in novel social arrangements than in further technology. The most feared futures arise from an amplification of trends already at play in the present: economic growth at the expense of the environment and quality of life, lack of equity, poor government, corporate greed, commercialism and erosion of social values. Economic and material growth does not feature in the most desired futures which are local, inclusive, peaceful, equitable and in some cases frugal. The visions and scenarios developed find a place within established foresight frameworks and global political narratives, but seem to lie at the fringe of current media and short-term political discourse. These results should not be interpreted as representative of the overall Australian population, but suggest that extending the analysis to the broader community could provide significant insights and enrich the discussion of important societal choices. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2015, 7 223

show abstract

“…Recent research has also indicated a number of individual difference factors that potentially moderate these relationships. One line of evidence suggests that ideological consistency (i.e., the independence between RWA and SDO) depends on a number of moderating factors including (a) the degree to which society is politically organized along a single left-right dimension (Duckitt, 2001;Duriez et al, 2005), and (b) individual differences in political interest and participation (Mirisola, Sibley, Boca, & Duckitt, 2007), political and religious identity (Dallago, Cima, Roccato, Ricolfi, & Mirisola, 2008;De Regt, 2012), and education (Achterberg & Houtman, 2009). These findings suggest that the motivational goals described in the DPM are closely related to the sociopolitical context.…”

Section: Caveats and Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

Perry

Sibley

2013

Anal Soc Iss & Public Policy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dual process model (DPM) of ideology and prejudice suggests that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) should differentially predict support for social versus economic policies. We test a differential prediction hypothesis in which support for social policies should be predicted by RWA, and support for economic policies should be predicted by SDO. We further test a dual mediation hypothesis suggesting that RWA and SDO differentially mediate the indirect effects of distinct combinations of personality traits and social worldviews on these policy attitudes. The hypothesized model provided a reasonable fit in a large New Zealand sample (N = 6,886). Policy attitudes thus consist of at least two dimensions: social versus economic. Individual differences in these attitudes are differentially predicted by RWA and SDO-in much the same way as generalized intergroup attitudes and prejudice.

show abstract

On the ideological consistency between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation

Cited by 47 publications

References 12 publications

The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

The Dual Process Model of Ideology and Prejudice: A Longitudinal Test During a Global Recession

Citizens’ Views of Australia’s Future to 2050

A Dual‐Process Motivational Model of Social and Economic Policy Attitudes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About